YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion) (was: GOPHER

On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:02 -0700, Fred Cisin wrote: I thought the same thing :-) I'm sure people raise the ten year rule more often than used to happen on this list. I don't know why that is - I first joined 1998 or so and the ratio of on topic vs. OT was about the same as it is now (i.e. hardly any OT content) - that's pretty amazing considering the diversity of list members. Surely the fact there's cctech now makes it even better for those not wanting the odd OT post? Personally I don't see the problem at all; things kinda regulate themselves, and some pretty nice hardware has been made around the 10 year boundary - just not in the PC/Mac world IMHO (but I still wouldn't get upset at people posting such questions because it's still a fraction of total list traffic) Seriously, what's wrong with the way things are? I don't get it... cheers, Jules