I always thought the white looked cool but I am partial to the amber and
green. The amber color reminds me of the monitor on my first computer (a
5160 w/ a Hercules compatible card) and there is something soothing about
the slow fade of the green phosphor. I say leave it be unless it really
bothers you, and if it does then you can always uses a 5153 w/ the 9 pin
connector or another monitor with the composite connector.
-Ali
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Paul Koning
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:13 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: IBM 5155 Portable PC CRT Sacrilege
On Aug 28, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Sam O'nella <barythrin at gmail.com> wrote:
I do recall both green and amber were considered to
cause less strain
on the eyes than white, especially during night time computing. I was
sort of wondering if IBM chose amber just because their competition
(Compaq
Portable) already used green.
DEC terminals were initially white (VT05 through VT100). At some point in
the VT220 era, green and amber appeared as alternate colors. Somewhat after
that, I think the original black & white TV set style white changed to
"paper white".
It would be interesting to find out the sales proportions of the three
colors. I remember them all; I never saw more than a handful of either
green or amber.
Early on, green was associated with long persistence displays - the GT40,
the CDC dd60 console, etc. I know early IBM terminals (like the ones for
TSO -- 2550?) were green but I'm not sure why. Amber showed up much later
and as far as I could tell was just a fad that appeared briefly and went
nowhere.
The eyestrain argument has been made for any number of colors, even plasma
panel orange. I don't know that it was ever more than marketing fictions.
The only difference I know of is that some people like one color and some
prefer another.
paul