30 Apr
1998
30 Apr
'98
1:07 a.m.
In a message dated 98-04-30 00:39:32 EDT, you write:
<< Heck, wasn't the name "Apple" licensed from the British record
company of
the same name (Apple the computer company could use the name as long as
they didn't get into the music business. . .which made things get
interesting when people started doing MIDI stuff with Macs . . .)
>
yea, wasnt it the beatles who had something called apple records or something
like that? i remember reading somewhere sometime long ago about the legalities
of it. obviously, apple records got precedence because they were there first.
did apple computer ever have to pay money for the resolution?
david