2 Feb
2012
2 Feb
'12
12:37 a.m.
In article <4F29D19A.4020007 at brouhaha.com>,
Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com> writes:
Richard wrote:
I suppose if you do that, then the receive MUA isn't required to cope
with format=flowed (which IIRC says you are free to *reformat* it any
way you like, including ignoring EOLs in the existing message as well
as adding them). That would be preferable because it still allows
MUAs that support format=flowed to do whatever they want, but flows
the text to a reasonable length for MUAs that don't support
format=flowed.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 version available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
The problem with format=flowed, is that it just
doesn't work well with
older mail clients.
Do you object to format=flowed, when the sending MUA has also
wrapped
the lines at a reasonable length? As far as I can tell, that's what
Thunderbird now does by default.