On 9 Jul 2012 at 8:41, Fred Cisin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Yes, people made their living programming stuff
like this at one
time. Real "old school".
If'n you can call that "living"
Heh, I remember that a friend worked for a Chicago-area manufacturer
that had just replaced their unit-record equipment with a 360/20
setup. Every week a big thick report would be generated and bound
and placed on the desk of the CEO.
Whereupon, it would be placed in a closet with all of the other
weekly thick reports, never to be read.
A couple of years down the road, said CEO went to an IBM marketing
session (something along the line of "What modern data processing can
do for your company"). Of course, IBM carpet-bombed the affair with
sales people and system analysts. Said CEO asked about modernizing
his operation (he lied and said it was basically a paper ledger
operation, but had salses and production data ready). The analyst
replied that he thought his operation was the perfect candidate for
some unit-record automation. When asked about a computer, the guy
responded that it was probably overkill.
The contract for the 360/20 was terminated the next week. My friend
lost his job and went back to school.
I've always thought that a lot of BDP (there's another acronym for
you new-schoolers) was make-work.
--Chuck