23 Feb
2016
23 Feb
'16
6:44 a.m.
On 22 February 2016 at 17:36, Mazzini Alessandro <mazzinia at tin.it> wrote:
Not to intrude, but apple could also have gone with
the serious power cpu,
thus not "needing" to move to x86. As long as there's enough of a push, sw
houses release versions for a different architecture... and power is hardly
a dead end.
The problem is that the mainstream PC market is increasingly going to
portables. Laptops outsell desktops 2 times over now.
POWER chips are still going strong but they're big and run hot taking
lots of power. Apple needed a CPU line that could offer good notebook
chips as well as desktop chips, and POWER (and PowerPC) was only
addressing desktop devices.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)