Did not see what Liam even said.? I tend to skip anything he posts. As what he says do not
relate to what I am working on or are corrosive?
Guess I will have to check out the archive!?Ed#
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 9:57 AM, Chris Long via cctalk<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote: The fact I don?t think it is necessary for a Lego set specifically endorsing the
role of women in computing is unpleasant or mean spirited?
Get a life Liam. I simply expressed my view.
Are we really at a state on this list where when someone posts mentioning something, that
anyone who expresses any alternative view is behaving unacceptably?
Talk about snowflakes.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Liam Proven via cctalk
Sent: 05 December 2021 15:17
To: Doc Shipley <doc at vaxen.net>; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Women of Computing
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 16:09, Doc Shipley via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
On 12/4/21 12:37, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote:
OK, Boomer.
There's really no call to be nasty about it.
To those of us who are baby boomers, that usage is extremely offensive.
I suspect that was the plan.
Chris Long's email was nasty, unpleasant and a mean-spirited and unpleasant thing to
say. The fact that they felt the need to say it on a public forum indicates either that
they do not care what other people feel, or that they wanted to cause offence.
When someone is so insensitive that they do not understand that their words can hurt
others, then sometimes, an effective way to show to them that words can be hurtful and
that they shouldn't say mean things, is to say something that is hurtful to them.
This can illustrate to people who do not normally care about others'
feelings that they do not like it when their own feelings are hurt.
It is, sadly, a common attribute of a certain age group, especially of old white straight
men, to give little regard to others' feelings like this. They typically consider a
waste of time any kind of affirmative action that helps, boosts, or engages with people
who are not old, white, straight and men.
This is a bad way to behave. Nobody should act like that. It violates Wheaton's Law,
which is a basic principle of how to be a civilised human being.
"OK, Boomer" is just a succinct and clear way of saying "you are an
unpleasant old man and we do not need to listen to your useless hurtful opinions."
If that sounds like you, then my advice to you is not to complain about it, but to engage
with it, and learn how not to be such a person, and then go and teach other such folk how
to be better people.
If it doesn't sound like you, then you should not be bothered by it.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile:
https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven at
gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053