film cameras was Re: Blue screen of Basic

Wait... That Ken Rockwell article says *nothing* about film grain. I even searched it for the word grain. How on earth can you write an article about the relative resolution of film without a word regarding grain?! Sent from my iPhone On 2012-10-29, at 12:04 PM, Diane Bruce <db at db.net> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:36:41AM -0700, Zane H. Healy wrote: >> At 3:44 PM +0100 10/29/12, Joost van de Griek wrote: >>> Here are some musings on this subject, in regards to still >>> photography: <http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/film-resolution.htm> >> >> Referencing Ken Rockwell is another good way to start a flame war. >> It is disturbing how many people think he's a credible source. >> Though sometimes he is the easiest way to get basic info. >> >> Zane > > I'm glad you said it and not me. It needed saying. > >> +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ >> | My flickr Photostream | >> | http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ | > > Oh why not. > > These are some of my shots, mostly snaps. > http://www.flickr.com/photos/dyanora/ > > >> | My Photography Website | >> | http://www.zanesphotography.com | > > Diane > -- > - db at FreeBSD.org db at db.net http://www.db.net/~db > Nowadays tar can compress using yesterdays latest technologies!