Jeff, Dave, Alexandre, Gordon and G?ran (and the others who have
telneted in.)
Thanks!
I saw some messages last night on my session, but they must have come in
past my bed time. :-) The sysop page is just a small beep - in the
future the code will figure out it is on a PCjr and do something more
elaborate, like take advantage of the 3 voice sound or the speech
adapter sidecar. Totally superfluous though.
I haven't looked at the logs yet because they are on the machine being
tested, but so far things look good. In the last twelve hours:
Highest number of concurrent sessions: 4
Total sessions: 49
Tcp Pkts Sent 22317
Rcvd 19353
Retrans 34
Seq/Ack errs 364
Dropped 0 (due to lack of TCP buffers)
Pkt stats: Incoming pkts: 19969
Dropped: 0 (due to lack of pkt buffers)
Sent: 22390
The last time I did this test I didn't have telnet option negotiation
and I wasn't echoing characters. This time around the number of packets
is significantly higher, which is great for testing.
The machine running the test can be seen here:
http://brutman.com/PCjr_WD_small.jpg
That's not the network card it is running on at the moment, but I've
used it in previous tests. Right now it's running on a parallel port
adapter which gives me about half the throughput of the big Western
Digital card. (I don't like the big card hanging out exposed like that
for an extended test.)
The machine is fairly vanilla. 640K, Nec V20 CPU, and two parallel
ports upgraded to bi-directional. The .EXE file for the code it is
running is only around 70KB in size. Total RAM required is probably
less than what I used on the IRC client, so it should run in a 256K
machine. For a telnet BBS (which is what it will be one day) a 512K or
640K machine will be plenty.
Nobody has alerted me to bad behavior yet and the machine is not on
fire, so if you want to pay a visit again to see the packet counts go
up, try another telnet client, or try to break it please feel free ...
The address again is: 97.86.233.68
Mike