10 Nov
2006
10 Nov
'06
9:32 a.m.
In article <20061110010905.76201.qmail at web61025.mail.yahoo.com>,
Chris M <chrism3667 at yahoo.com> writes:
--- Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
wrote:
Modula-2 most definatley wasn't object-oriented. It was a procedural
language on steroids. Later extensions, sure, but not standard
Modula-2.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
I don't recall Modula-2 being OO...?
Neither do I. I don't even remember Modula-2. But it
was claimed by this person that "it" was oo. I don't
know what implementation of the language he was using,
but I'll find out. Stay tuned ;)