31 Jan
2013
31 Jan
'13
9:09 a.m.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Bert Thomas wrote:
Something really smells bad about the whole thing, almost as if there's
collusion between the landlord and the various recyclers.
I really hope that Sellam gets some relief through the legal system, but
if he's really in the middle of a big "good old boys" network that may be
an uphill fight.
--
I can accept
that there may be cases where a landlord can auction items
left on premises under a default, but I'm not aware of any situation
where they are allowed to blindly profit from the action.
They don't do they? It's another party that's profiting?