The demise of CRTs is not something I'm
crying over,
Me neither, in theory.
I am.
I can understnad how CRT-based monitors work. I can generally fix them.
They're not a PCB of unrecogniasble nad untestable BGA blobs linked to an
LCD iwth transistors i nthe glass.
Dome machines should, IMHO, be kept with CRT montiors. Things like the
PERQs. Adn anything wit ha built-in CRT (TRS80 M3/M4, HP130, HP150, etc).
The demise of CRT monitors means that spare CRTs and things like flyback
transfomers are goign to be harder to get i nthe future
But even the cheapest of CRTs could usually autosync to a video signal
without putting half a character - or sometimes more - off the edge of
the visible display, something I regularly find "modern" flatscreens
doing. And this is when connected to peecees, too.
And I have a CRT that's willing to sync to a much-too-wide video
signal, just squashing it down. It doesn't look good, but it mostly
Hmmm. SOme CRT monitors, if fed a signal with the wrong horizontal scan
rate, could end up wdamaging partis in the hoizotnal output stage. I
think I'd prefer 'Sorry I can't display that'.
works; text is legible, for example. Modern
flatscreens usually
display nothing, or at most an "I can't display this" box, instead of
doing something sensible with such input.
-tony