On 6/30/2013 8:13 PM, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At 6:34 PM -0400 6/30/13, BE Arnold wrote:
And the
statement isn't necessarily true, as both rates could be part
of the ships self-defense force.
I dunno, I'd be worried if whoever made it through the ship's Marine
contingent and we were left with a gaggle of SKs and YMs.
Then again, knowing some of the marines I've known...
Most ships don't have Marines onboard.
Zane
Actually, I think developed a system which was designed to prevent
surreptitious boarding of ships, which was on cruisers and destroyers.
I don't know about the battleships, as it was at the time that they were
going away.
The BB's had larger crews due to the inefficiency of the design and the
needs of the modern navy. For just a gun platform they are obviously
unequal, but as a platform for modern weapons they weren't so good.
However to keep personnel that had no business off the ship, and to
account for man overboards, there was and may still be a system to
detect that and sound an alarm. A friend looked into licensing it for
use on large private yachts, such as Job's and Allen types, but was
turned down due to military concerns. It was a typical screwup, in that
they developed it for private vessels, but once it was on a "Military"
ship, couldn't go to the private market.
If you recall a multi-millionaire named McMillan that died falling off
his yacht, my friend actually tried to sell it to him, and he would
possibly have been saved, since he fell overboard and was not missed for
hours by the crew of his yacht.
He had a lot of such large private yachts with power systems he had sold
(3 phase shore any voltage or phase sequence to onboard 3phase @
whatever the ship needed)., and could have sold a lot of the personnel
systems.
Jim