9 Feb
2012
9 Feb
'12
10:52 a.m.
On 2012-02-09 02:26, Dave McGuire<mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 02/08/2012 08:18 PM, Charles Dickman wrote:
As far as I can remember, no. That was the point. It is a SCSI
controller, not an MSCP controller.
By the way, yes, there is plenty of SCSI support in VMS. All of the more
modern VAXstations and whatnot have only native SCSI, and no MSCP or
similar.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:31 PM,
allison<ajp166 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> There is no SCSI support in VMS at all.
> >>
>
> What was the KZQSA for? I got one and thought I had scored a qbus scsi
> adapter and quickly determined it was pretty much useless. What I
> never understood for sure was if it lacked hardware documentation and
> drivers and was not supported for general SCSI use or if it was
> broken/crippled in some way so that it couldn't be used for general
> SCSI.
That's a driver issue and was some sort of "business
decision".
(means "got screwed up by suits for no good reason")
And it is an MSCP controller, is it not?