9 Feb
2012
9 Feb
'12
2:52 a.m.
On 2012-02-09 02:26, Dave McGuire<mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 02/08/2012 08:18 PM, Charles Dickman wrote:
As far as I can remember, no. That was the point. It is a SCSI
controller, not an MSCP controller.
By the way, yes, there is plenty of SCSI support in VMS. All of the more
modern VAXstations and whatnot have only native SCSI, and no MSCP or
similar.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:31 PM,
allison<ajp166 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> There is no SCSI support in VMS at all.
> >>
>
> What was the KZQSA for? I got one and thought I had scored a qbus scsi
> adapter and quickly determined it was pretty much useless. What I
> never understood for sure was if it lacked hardware documentation and
> drivers and was not supported for general SCSI use or if it was
> broken/crippled in some way so that it couldn't be used for general
> SCSI.
That's a driver issue and was some sort of "business
decision".
(means "got screwed up by suits for no good reason")
And it is an MSCP controller, is it not? 
18 Feb
18 Feb
12:31 a.m.
DEC actually made its own SCSI drives at one point in Germany.
It certainly re-branded other makes.
There is nothing wrong with the KZQSA and I'll take any that are unwanted.
Third party DEC SCSI controllers - more than a couple - no special drivers
required and I have several in use.
Regards
?
Rod Smallwood
?
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 09 February 2012 10:52
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: VAX for running old version of VMS
On 2012-02-09 02:26, Dave McGuire<mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 02/08/2012 08:18 PM, Charles Dickman wrote:
As far as I can remember, no. That was the point. It is a SCSI
controller, not an MSCP controller.
By the way, yes, there is plenty of SCSI support in VMS. All of the more
modern VAXstations and whatnot have only native SCSI, and no MSCP or
similar.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:31 PM,
allison<ajp166 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> There is no SCSI support in VMS at all.
> >>
>
> What was the KZQSA for? I got one and thought I had scored a qbus scsi
> adapter and quickly determined it was pretty much useless. What I
> never understood for sure was if it lacked hardware documentation and
> drivers and was not supported for general SCSI use or if it was
> broken/crippled in some way so that it couldn't be used for general
> SCSI.
That's a driver issue and was some sort of "business
decision".
(means "got screwed up by suits for no good reason")
And it is an MSCP controller, is it not? 
12:50 a.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Rod Smallwood
Sent: 18 February 2012 08:31
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only'
Subject: RE: VAX for running old version of VMS
DEC actually made its own SCSI drives at one point in Germany.
It certainly re-branded other makes.
There is nothing wrong with the KZQSA and I'll take any that are unwanted.
Third party DEC SCSI controllers - more than a couple - no special drivers
required and I have several in use.
Regards
Rod Smallwood
Me too, if anyone has surplus KZQSA or KFQSA, then let me know.
Regards
Rob
8:25 a.m.
> There is nothing wrong with the KZQSA and I'll
take any that are
> unwanted.
Me too, if anyone has surplus KZQSA or KFQSA, then let
me know.
Me too.
If there are Qbus SCSI boards of any sort looking for homes I doubt
they'll have trouble finding takers.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
20 Feb
20 Feb
11:25 a.m.
Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-02-09 02:26, Dave McGuire<mcguire at
neurotica.com> wrote:
Jonny I have had a very similar problem on my experimental KA630 uVAXII
with the Emulex UC07/08 Controllers. I've tried to connect some IBM 4GB
Disk since they where quiet. That hasn't worked at all. The Emulex
Firmware was happy, but neighter the RT11 (with an 11/53 CPU) nor the
VAX could access the two logical disks I've created on that drive.
Must have something todo with the emulex firmware that I have on that
controller.
Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
On 02/08/2012 08:18 PM, Charles Dickman wrote:
As far as I can remember, no. That was the point. It is a SCSI
controller, not an MSCP controller.
By the way, yes, there is plenty of SCSI support in VMS. All of the more
modern VAXstations and whatnot have only native SCSI, and no MSCP or
similar.
Johnny
-- > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:31 PM,
allison<ajp166 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> There is no SCSI support in VMS at all.
>>>
>
> What was the KZQSA for? I got one and thought I had scored a qbus scsi
> adapter and quickly determined it was pretty much useless. What I
> never understood for sure was if it lacked hardware documentation and
> drivers and was not supported for general SCSI use or if it was
> broken/crippled in some way so that it couldn't be used for general
> SCSI.
That's a driver issue and was some sort of "business
decision".
(means "got screwed up by suits for no good reason")
And it is an MSCP controller, is it not?
4471
days inactive
4482
days old
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
bqt＠softjar.se -
holm＠freibergnet.de -
mouse＠Rodents-Montreal.ORG -
robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com -
rodsmallwood＠btconnect.com