7 Jul
2004
7 Jul
'04
9:59 a.m.
>>>> "Vintage" == Vintage
Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com> writes:
Vintage> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Paul Koning wrote:
Joe> Seriously, what's the difficulty?
> Did they check the recipient's name against
the denied parties
> list? Do they even know what a denied parties list is? Did they
> check the export category of the item being exported, and verify
> what the export rules are that apply to *that* category for *that*
> destination country and type of recipient?
>
> That's the difficulty.
Vintage> The US Post Office makes no mention of this requirement,
Vintage> which is still fairly new as far as I know.
I know it existed in 2000. I suspect it has existed for many years
before then.
Vintage> So as long as the USPS is not enforcing it, then what does
Vintage> it really matter?
As the old saying goes "ignorance of the law is not an excuse".
Vintage> Once Bush and his ill lot is out of office it's not going to
Vintage> matter anyway. The US PATRIOT act is going to be relegated
Vintage> to the shitheap of history (along with the rest of his
Vintage> putrid administration).
Vintage> (Or am I being WAY TOO optimistic?)
Rather than get into political debates, I'll just point out that this
whole discussion has NOTHING to do with the Patriot act. Export
controls have been in existence for decades. They will continue under
either party.
(You might look into which party was in power when the Clipper chip
debacle was underway.)
paul