23 Mar
2006
23 Mar
'06
1:50 p.m.
In article <052401c64ec2$52002140$21fe54a6 at ibm23xhr06>,
"John Allain" <allain at panix.com> writes:
But personally, I'd prefer less of:
1./ Drive by URL's. Hey L@@k at this link, and the poster gives
no further or maybe a two word description.
2./ Sellers who post 2 or more auctions in seperate emails,
where they could be bunched together in one.
Well, this sort of thing is one of those "can't please anyone"
scenarios. Some people will like the postings, some people won't.
Some people will like concise descriptions, some people won't.
As I say, I share things that took me some work beyond a simple search
to find and which I think there might be interest here. However, if
the consensus is for me to cease and desist, I'll stop sharing. It
doesn't make any difference to me, although I share weird auction
items out of a desire to tip off someone here who may be interested in
acquiring that item.
So shall I continue with the sorts of items I've been posting, or
would the list rather I cease?
I'm ok either way, my feelings won't be hurt! :-)
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>