besides the Poppy Chuck, what vintage beauties do you
have "hanging" around the house?
--- Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
On 29 Sep 2007 at 23:03, Tony Duell wrote:
Well, if I wanted a fast PC, I'd buy a fast
PC.
But if I want to
experience a QX10, I'll use a QX10, and have
all
the fun of tracing video
problems caused by extra components [ask if you
want to know _that_
story], and aligning those wonderful voice-coil
floppy drives...
I'm more interested in the software. Much of it was
implemented in
Forth and there were some very interesting aspects
of the
implementation.
For my purposes, an accurate emulator is just as
good (or even
better) than the original. I don't need to worry
about flakey
components, or out-of-adjustment drives. I can run
multiple sessions
for comparison and even hack the emulator code to
trap what I'm
interested in.
As far as "recreating the experience", I honestly
don't think it's
possible without the use of hynotism and some
psychoactive drugs.
I'm not who I was in 1982 (thankfully!) and any
"gee-whiz" that the
real thing had in 1982 is not going to make the same
impression on me
today. (256KB? Golly, my wife's digital camera
packs more than 4
orders of magnitude more on a MicroSD card--and it's
nonvolatile).
I don't really care if it's implemented with chicken
nuggets and used
chewing gum--as long as it works and runs the
software I'm interested
in.
So, hang me for a heretic. :)
Cheers,
Chuck
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos
& more.