On Aug 8, 2014, at 12:49 AM, Nigel Williams <nw at retrocomputingtasmania.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:21 PM, steven stengel
<tosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
Model 5322:
Predates the "IBM PC" by 1 month
Intel 8085
Has it ever been conclusively proven this was based on an 8085, that
is the modernised Intel 8-bit 8080?
See my earlier post. Yes it was *definitely* an 8085 with additional HW to
allow for up to 128KB of ROM and 128KB of RAM.
The internal SW automatically handled dealing with "page" crossings and
allocations. I can't remember exactly the size of a page (1K seems to stick
in my mind but it could be 16K as well...too long ago). The other cool thing
was that all of the memory allocation was automatic and garbage collected.
That required the internal SW to recompute the physical address of an "object"
that was being used if something was invoked that could have caused a
garbage collection.
I'm a little surprised that with the Displaywriter based on an 8086
and the IBM PC on the 8088, why an 8085? did IBM use 8-bit
microprocessors in any other contemporary desktop-level products?
Because the DataMaster was started before the 8088 was available. The SW
took *way* longer than expected because of several changes in direction. At
first the BASIC was its own variant. Then it was to be compatible with the
5110/5120. The final change (and what we ultimately shipped) was to be
compatible (more or less) with S/34. Which BTW is why it's called System/23
Datamaster. The name was intended to imply that S/23 and S/34 were related.
BTW because of the lateness of S/23, an interim project the 5120 was done
(basically a repackaged 5110) so that there was a current product in the
market.
TTFN - Guy