On 8/22/2011 1:13 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 22 Aug 2011 at 12:43, Keith Monahan wrote:
Sure. And I forgot the differential ones, too.
Do you mean RS-422 and RS-485? I tend to think of those more as
multidrop/network signalling methods. Didn't Novell start out with
an RS-422 networking scheme?
--Chuck
Exactly. A lot (all?) of my RS-422 applications were point to point, I
think. RS-449 on the DB37, and RS-530 on the DB25. With the addressable
nature of RS-485, they had the tendency to be multidrop more often.
There were some Allen Bradley PLCs, Scada systems, and the like to which
we were interfaced.
I dealt with both async applications, and sync applications between
routers and CSU/DSUs when leased lines were much more popular.
Cisco had(has) what they called a 5-in-1 interface(later more, maybe
8-in-1) with matching cables that had a high-density 60-pin connector on
the router side, and then the appropriate connector on the other side.
With shorting groups within the HD60, it told the cisco hardware which
electrical standard to pick and use.
The cable would also tell the router if it was appearing as a DTE or a
DCE, and this would control directions of signals -- but also whether
clock generation was allowed on the interface. DCE's could
provide/source the clock, but DTE's could receive only. The router was
typically the DTE, with the CSU/DSUs, multiplexors, etc being the DCE's.
Normally the clock would be generated on the leased circuit, and then
the CSU/DSU's on both ends of the link would recover the clock, and then
sync the transmissions of the routers to it.
We had one router that had in essence a frequency counter, and it could
actually display in real-time(more or less) the current rate present on
the clock interface.
Cisco also had a DTE/DCE crossover cable with HD60's on both sides. One
side was shorted to be a DTE and the other a DCE. You would enable
clocking on the DCE side, and it would allow two routers to communicate
back-to-back without the need for any intermediate equipment.
I would also be remiss if I didn't mention V.35, probably the most
popular serial sync interface on routers.
Keith