22 Aug
2001
22 Aug
'01
7:06 a.m.
Well I must admit to finding some hilarious moments in this current thread
and am against imposing on Jay the onerous and unthankfull job of
censorship of non-commercial OT threads, I must also agree that these OT
messages do compromise the integrity of the list. Anyone who has tried
extracting usefull info from eg: the Fido Rainbow archives and experienced
sorting thru the frustrating rants and OT discussions that went on, would do
well to remember those who follow. They won't give a damn about some minor
former pres. of these United States. A little self-restraint would go a long way.
Oh, and I'm baaack !! - after completing an arduous move of most of my
collection to my retirement home in the boonies of north-central Manitoba.
Lawrence
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Sipke de Wal wrote:
Reply to:
lgwalker(a)mts.net
Howevermuch i would like more moderation on the
list.....
It will be a pity for future social scientists who will thus be deprived of an
unexhaustible source of raw (un)social data ;)
Does all the OT-static end up in the archives too ?
Unfortunately, yes. And think about it this way: future hobbyists,
historians and researches will have to wade through 50 off-topic and out
of context messages before they find that ONE message that actually
contains the information they were looking for.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org