On 10 Oct 2011 at 21:10, Tony Duell wrote:
I have seen a jeweller's soldering torch that
works by electrolysing
water (using power from the mains) and then brunign the resulting H_2
and O_2 to probvide the soldering flame, but that violates no laws.
The energy uoi get from the flame comes from the mains electricity
supply.
For the mileage thing, just do a web search on "HHO mileage". "HHO"
is the "in" term for what is also called "Brown's Gas", which is
nothing more than a mixture of electrolysis products.
I have a friend who makes custom flutes (draws his own silver tubing,
etc.) and uses a water torch. But the thing uses potassium hydroxide
(very caustic) to improve ionization and the rig draws about 13A at
240V to produce a fairly small flame. For him, it's probably ideal
for items, such as keywork, as the oxyhydrogen flame has less heat
(for a comparably-sized flame) and a lower temperature than
oxyacetylene, yet is still hot enough to braze with without burning
the workpiece. I haven't worked out the cost per BTU, but it could
be cheaper.
I do some silver-soldering, but it's low-temperature. (1000-1300F),
so acetylene-air works just fine.
They're
still out there and just as evangelical about it, but lately
the Rossi eCAT LENR snake oil has attracted many of the faithful.
Oh well... A fool and his money are soon parted.
It's the waste of good human intellect and effort that bothers me.
Witness how many people jumped on Fleischman and Pons' bandwagon.
Didn't France sink a considerable sum into a "cold fusion" research
site? I suppose that the only people who made real money were the
early palladium futures commodity speculators.
Most of the claims made since F&P, including Rossi, are undoubtedly
due to poor metrology and a basic misunderstanding of metrology
techniques.
--Chuck