On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:10 PM, TeoZ <teoz at neo.rr.com> wrote:
Sure we need more people to design locked in closed
overpriced platforms you
cannot service.
I've repaired broken Mac hardware - it's not as easy as for some other
platforms (like the Amiga, one of the last home computer makers I can
think of that published their schematics) but one can infer a lot from
inspecting a board and reverse-engineering some schematics.
People here complain about Intel/Microsoft
Yes, and not without merit. We also complain about Oracle/Sun, IBM,
and other big name vendors. Being large makes you a target and does
not make you immune to detractors.
but I think Jobs
was 100 time worse in his my way or the highway approach to computing.
It's more like, "my way or Bill's Highway," when you boil it all down.
I'm no Apple Fanboi but I've purchased and used Apple products over
the past 25 years (often second-hand, since I'm not a fan of Apple
prices). There are things I liked and things I didn't like about
nearly everything the company has ever made. When the ratio is
favorable, I'll likely buy and use that item. When it's unfavorable,
I'll use something else. Some years, I use Apple products every day,
other years, not so much.
I prefer the things I buy to be openable and repairable, but just
because something isn't doesn't mean I would _never_ buy it. Most
people who buy cars don't do their own maintenance (I do stuff I can
and pay other people for stuff I can't or prefer not to). These days,
most people don't do their own computer/electronic maintenance either.
They buy something, use it, break it or get distracted by the new
shiny, then replace it. They just don't care that it's difficult to
fix. They care how shiny it is. I'm happy to be more than a passive
consumer, but that's a minority position.
-ethan