30 Jan
2013
30 Jan
'13
8:03 p.m.
As much as it pains me to say it, if Sellam is successful in any litigation
he has an unassailable argument as to what the minimum value of the stuff
is. The culprits won't have a leg to stand on.
++++++++++
Kevin Parker
++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of N0body H0me
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013 2:37 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: $4,000 for an Apple II ?
-----Original Message-----
From: mc68010 at gmail.com
Sent: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:12:25 -0800
To:
Subject: Re: $4,000 for an Apple II ?
On 1/30/2013 6:00 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
All that means is, is that people who are good at being evil aren't stupid.
They've got a major cash cow, and they're milking it for all she's got.
Sellam hasn't a chance now, sorry to say. They're making too much money!
____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and
family!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
On 1/30/13 5:38 PM, Paul Hagstrom wrote:
One of the things that is interesting to me about this whole
Sellam/Tvrsales thing is how much the seller seems to know about the
gear and how to list it. Obviously google is your friend but, they are
listing so many items and they seem to have a general idea what they
are selling. Much more so than many recyclers I have dealt with.
Coming out of Stockton, Ca this is even more confusing to me. Seems
like they must have someone that knows at least a little about vintage
gear working with them on this. This same machine sold a couple of weeks earlier
for a little over
$4700, but for some reason it got re-listed.
look who the seller is, and where they are located (hint.. STOCKTON,
CA)