24 Apr
2006
24 Apr
'06
12:44 p.m.
In article <020b01c667c6$931c5190$6500a8c0 at BILLING>,
"Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org> writes:
A terminal server probably isn't the best choice
then. Not completely, but
in general, terminal servers are designed to take an ETHERNET connection to
a telnet-capable host and make it available to dumb terminals or vice versa.
It doesn't sound like you are trying to so that.
Actually this is *exactly* what I'm trying to do.
You most likely don't want a terminal server, you
want the data pbx that
someone else mentioned.
Why do you say that? I can't tell the difference between a data pbx
and a terminal server at this point.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>