8 Dec
2018
8 Dec
'18
6:28 p.m.
Yes.
I replied to the spam, as shown below, although I switched it from cctech
to cctalk.
You replied to me, saying subscribers weren't moderated. I got that.
I replied to you, questioning whether hempoil was subscribed.
You replied to that. I got that.
AND, you replied to the one from Michael Mulhern:
Other than your reply to Michael Mulhern's message, I never
received the post from Michael Mulhern that you were replying to:
So, my count is:
1) Hempoil spam
2) my reply
3) your reply to me
4) my reply to you
5) your reply to me
I NEVER GOT Michael Mulhern's post.
7?) your reply to Micheal Mulhern I got THAT, but not Michael Mulhern's
post that you were replying to.
8) Bill Gunshannon's reply to you
On 12/8/18 4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote:
We are the spambot challenge?
Something like
that.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 12/8/18 6:44 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
And, other than the mention of it by Grant, I
never got Michael
Mulhern's message.
Um ??? Fred, I replied to your email, which was itself a reply to the
spam message.
On 12/8/18 3:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
WOW!
That is the first TRULY obviously and unarguably spam post that I've
seen make it past the cctech moderation!
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die