8 Dec
2018
8 Dec
'18
7:36 p.m.
On 12/8/18 4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote:
We are the spambot challenge?
Something like that.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
8:44 p.m.
On 12/8/18
4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote:
On
12/8/18 7:36 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
> Something like that.
> We are the spambot challenge?
Until people started commenting on it I never saw it.?
It was flagged
as SPAM and never showed up in my INBOX.
And, other than the mention of it by Grant, I never got Michael Mulhern's
message.
8:55 p.m.
On 12/8/18 6:44 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
And, other than the mention of it by Grant, I never
got Michael
Mulhern's message.
Um ? Fred, I replied to your email, which was itself a reply to the spam
message.
On 12/8/18 3:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
WOW!
That is the first TRULY obviously and unarguably spam post that I've
seen make it past the cctech moderation!
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
9:28 p.m.
Yes.
I replied to the spam, as shown below, although I switched it from cctech
to cctalk.
You replied to me, saying subscribers weren't moderated. I got that.
I replied to you, questioning whether hempoil was subscribed.
You replied to that. I got that.
AND, you replied to the one from Michael Mulhern:
Other than your reply to Michael Mulhern's message, I never
received the post from Michael Mulhern that you were replying to:
So, my count is:
1) Hempoil spam
2) my reply
3) your reply to me
4) my reply to you
5) your reply to me
I NEVER GOT Michael Mulhern's post.
7?) your reply to Micheal Mulhern I got THAT, but not Michael Mulhern's
post that you were replying to.
8) Bill Gunshannon's reply to you
On 12/8/18 4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote:
We are the spambot challenge?
Something like
that.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 12/8/18 6:44 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
And, other than the mention of it by Grant, I
never got Michael
Mulhern's message.
Um ??? Fred, I replied to your email, which was itself a reply to the
spam message.
On 12/8/18 3:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
WOW!
That is the first TRULY obviously and unarguably spam post that I've
seen make it past the cctech moderation!
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die 
10:15 p.m.
simlar chain for me
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:29 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
Yes.
I replied to the spam, as shown below, although I switched it from cctech
to cctalk.
You replied to me, saying subscribers weren't moderated. I got that.
I replied to you, questioning whether hempoil was subscribed.
You replied to that. I got that.
AND, you replied to the one from Michael Mulhern:
Other than your reply to Michael Mulhern's message, I never
received the post from Michael Mulhern that you were replying to:
So, my count is:
1) Hempoil spam
2) my reply
3) your reply to me
4) my reply to you
5) your reply to me
I NEVER GOT Michael Mulhern's post.
7?) your reply to Micheal Mulhern I got THAT, but not Michael Mulhern's
post that you were replying to.
8) Bill Gunshannon's reply to you
On 12/8/18 4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote:
We are the spambot challenge?
Something
like that.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 12/8/18 6:44 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
And, other than the mention of it by Grant, I
never got Michael
Mulhern's message.
Um ? Fred, I replied to your email, which was itself a reply to the
spam message.
On 12/8/18 3:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
WOW!
That is the first TRULY obviously and unarguably spam post that I've
seen make it past the cctech moderation!
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
10:22 p.m.
On 12/8/18 7:28 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
AND, you replied to the one from Michael Mulhern:
Other than your reply to Michael Mulhern's message, I never received the
post from Michael Mulhern that you were replying to:
Ah.
I misunderstood your comment to be about the reply to the original spam
email.
Sorry for the confusion. I'll go back to my corner now.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
10:27 p.m.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Ah.
I misunderstood your comment to be about the reply to the original spam
email.
Sorry for the confusion. I'll go back to my corner now.
Quite alright. I'm concerned about never getting a message, but not a big
deal, and I think that I got all of yours.
10:44 p.m.
On 12/8/18 8:27 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
Quite alright.
:-)
I'm concerned about never getting a message, but
not a big deal, and I
think that I got all of yours.
It sounds like there might be a couple of mailing lists in play, cctalk
(which I email) and cctech.
I know that there is history, and possibly plans to merge them. But
it's my understanding that that cctalk gets more email than cctech.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
9 Dec
9 Dec
1:27 a.m.
New subject: meHp lOi semimuG
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 06:28:51PM -0800, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
Yes.
I replied to the spam, as shown below, although I switched it from
cctech to cctalk.
[...]
Other than your reply to Michael Mulhern's
message, I never received
the post from Michael Mulhern that you were replying to:
So, my count is:
1) Hempoil spam
2) my reply
3) your reply to me
4) my reply to you
5) your reply to me
I NEVER GOT Michael Mulhern's post.
7?) your reply to Micheal Mulhern I got THAT, but not Michael
Mulhern's post that you were replying to.
8) Bill Gunshannon's reply to you
Same here. I found 1 and 2 in my 'smap forled' but not a trace of 6.
On 12/8/18 4:43 PM, Michael Mulhern wrote:
Cheer up, at least we are still smart enough to bend idiotic thread
into something useful. I can stand some maps, either it goes into maps
forled or I skip it. But I would rather get all emails sent to me, it
possible of course. But a getting majority is still a win, so, no big
fuss.
--
Regards,
Tomasz Rola
--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... **
** **
** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_rola at bigfoot.com **
We are the spambot challenge?
Something
like that.
2002
days inactive
2002
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
bill.gunshannon＠hotmail.com -
cctalk＠gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net -
cisin＠xenosoft.com -
rtomek＠ceti.pl -
tdk.knight＠gmail.com