On Apr 26, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
I have to admit that my big hurdle isn't writing
the implementation code, but rather writing GOOD verification/simulation code. It seems
that no matter how thorough you think you were, there's always a gotcha somewhere that
you didn't think of that rears its ugly head when you actually try to use the thing.
Thank heavens that the stuff is RE-programmable...
Absolutely. I wish our customers understood that writing proper
testbenches should take as long as implementation. Instead, we
often get MAYBE a quarter of the time, and then they complain
when the resulting FPGA is buggy.
Let's not talk about how much time they like to allocate for
documentation.
- Dave