26 Jan
2006
26 Jan
'06
1:43 p.m.
In article <m1F26Vr-000IyFC at p850ug1>,
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) writes:
Yeah, I have considered that too. Being lazy, I would probably opt
for swapping out a board with a bad component before I would try to
repair/replace the individual component. For instance, I have some
spare Lilith boards, including one marked "bad", but given that boards
for these machines are so rare, I am not going to chuck the board
marked "bad" in case it comes in handy for a future repair.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>
on other cg6s.
But I do have plenty of inract cg6s.
This brings up another point. If you do component-level repair, then a
single replacement board might act as donor to repair more than one
machine [...]