In article <20060404025850.GD20027 at alpha.rcac.purdue.edu>,
Patrick Finnegan <pat at computer-refuge.org> writes:
If the job
consisted of solving brain teasers all day, you might have
a point.
So, you've never had to troubleshoot anything on the job?
I do troubleshooting all the time -- its called debugging software.
Show me some code, some behavior and a debugger and I can trouble
shoot problems all day long (and fix them too, smarty pants! :).
Brain teasers don't show you my troubleshooting or debugging skills.
They show you my brain teaser skills. Like I said, I'm great at
debugging, sucky at brain teasers.
There's a lot you can find out about potential
employees by asking
non-job-related questions.
I still don't see the proven value of brain teasers. What I see is
people saying they think they're useful for inferring <insert human
property here> in an applicant. That's a far cry from the cold hard
logic of mathematics to prove to me that this isn't a fad. I also
notice that lots of people refer to using these with special
qualifiers as you did. That's not been my experience. Its pretty
clear that they dug these brain teasers out of a book somewhere.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>