--- On Thu, 1/26/12, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
I don't care if it's open source or not,
I'm more interested
in ease
of use and right-tool-for-the-job-ness.
So you'll definitely not want a Willem...
I know everyone has their favorite vintage programmer
that
only works
with MS-DOS and sticks and stone knives, but I'm not
interested in
recreating a "vintage PROM experience" as I am interested in
getting
the job of archiving all the little PROM bits in my
hardware.
Well, I use the vintage programmer because it works *correctly*. EVERY TIME. No messing
around, no fussing with settings, just does exactly what I want it to do, in a very easy
to use manner. The software is elegant and clean, and the hardware is reliable. It's
the right tool for the job because it does the job it's supposed to do. The fact that
it doesn't require Windows is a bonus. :)
Personally, I've not had any experience with the latest round of Chinese USB
programmers. They might be OK. You'd have to talk to someone that uses one. But
don't discount the old programmers - they were built back when EPROM technology was in
current use, and many of them work very, very well. Not only that, but many of the very
old ROM formats (bipolar PROMs) aren't supported by new programmers. If you only care
about stuff from about the mid 80's on up, then you should have absolutely no problem
with a modern, inexpensive programmer. But once you start needing to deal with anything
older (2532, bipolar PROM, etc) the support can get sketchy.
Not everything is just about the fact that we like using old stuff (we do), but sometimes
the old stuff really, truly, does work better than new stuff. It's frequently a lot
cheaper too. :)
-Ian