17 Nov
2000
17 Nov
'00
12:15 a.m.
Hi,
Those who think that instruction cycle time counting, memory and
i/o latency considerations are an anachronism haven't be exposed
to processors like the IXP-1200 from intel. These little monsters
force the programmer to consider the timing of every instruction
and the delays inherent in most memory accesses. This chip has 7
processors. A strongArm core and 6 microengines, each capable of
running 4 threads, with 1K of instruction memory / microengine.
It drives gigibit I/O for internet and telecom applications.
Here I am, 15 Years later, counting cycles and instructions again.
Just like the good old days.
Jim Davis.
Neil Cherry wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
Sellam Ismail wrote:
And in those days many a clever programmer derived an immense
intellectual satisfaction from the cunning tricks by means of which
he contrived to squeeze the impossible into the constraints of his
equipment.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra, "The Humble Programmer",
1972 ACM Turing Award Lecture
He was writing about the very early days of computer programming, when
every computer was unique. In these days of bloatware, there are very
few programmers that still practice the art of achieving the maximum
results from the minimum system (hardware and software). But those of
us that do so *still* derive "an immense intellectual satisfaction". :-)
Eric
Hey there are still those of use who have managed to write an asm prog
for a PIC based Cheese box in less than 50 bytes!