On 6/26/2013 12:13 PM, Liam Proven wrote:
Well, yes. Saying that, although I can drive, I
don't. I have never
owned a car and neither of my motorbikes has run in 5-6yr now. I live
in one of the cities with the best public transport systems in the
world; I don't need to. When the weather's OK, I mostly cycle --
bicycles being something else Tony doesn't approve of.
Not trying to sound
dismissive, but I truly cannot relate. The day I am
too old to drive and cannot pass the test and thus must surrender my
license will be, I am sure, one of the saddest days of my life.
It's impressive to understand the other perspectives.
I am told that if you have driven (particualrly if yoy've driven a lot)
you don't want to give it up. But if you haven't, you don't miss it :-)
More seirously, London public trasnport is moaned about, but it's not
that bad. London buses (meaning those you cna use with a London bus pass)
cover an araea bout 30 miles by 30 miles. You can get into som nice
countryside (if that's what you like), see buildings almost 900 years
old, etc, etc ,etc.
Yes, in some ways being able to drive eould be nice. I could visit and
phootgraph some of the old churches in the country (to me, that means
taking a 5*4" monorail camera, of course...).
But... when my parents were alive we often went down into Kent. The first
iem, actually, was for classic computer reasons, I was visiting a chap
who had a couple of machines to give away. A Philips P851 and P854. But
the area was so nice we kept goign back.
I don;'t know how much the car parking and fuel cost, but quite a bit.
Now, I stil lgo therte. I just buy a day ticket on the local buees. It
costs under \poundbs 7.00 (say $10). I stil lget to see the old churches,
visit the old vilages, etc. The only downside is havign to setoff from
hoem at 5:00 am.
If ever I could afford to ru na car, then yes, I would learn to drive.
But I don't feel my life is majorly upset by not being able to at the moment.
-tony