16 Oct
2008
16 Oct
'08
12:50 p.m.
In article <48F781AD.4090303 at brouhaha.com>,
Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com> writes:
Richard wrote:
Characters are not pixels, so no, I'm not setting a constraing on the
pixel size. I *am* arbitrarily excluding text terminals with graphic
character sets. Its not graphics in any sense that a practitioner of
computer graphics would call it. If it were, bitmapped based displays
Since I'm the one asking the question, I get to decide what the
question means. This isn't the floor of the US House of
Representatives.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
and
no before someone gets off on another torturous stretch of the
definition, "block" graphics character sets on text terminals don't
count either.
So now you're adding a constraint on the pixel size? That seems rather
arbitrary to me.