In article <4FE16406.7040409 at jwsss.com>,
jim s <jws at jwsss.com> writes:
the only thing I saw in the listing you pointed out is
that the video
sucks. It would be adequate to usable for text, but graphics, not so much.
It's not bad for it's time:
Graphics support
- 640 x 480 with 256 colors
- 800 x 600 with 256 colors
- 1024 x 768 with 16 colors
800x600 256 colors is pretty typical VGA for the period.
Hell, that's better than Tektronix graphics terminals of the mid 80s
:-).
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book
<http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>