For keyboards, I'd put it "middle of the
road." It was better than the
chicklet keyboards of the CoCo1, prolly equalish (to maybe "barely better")
than the "not quite full travel" keyboard of the CoCo2, but not as nice as
the CoCo3 keyboards... and (obviously) no comparison whatsoever to the my
I'm having dffficulty understnading that. The CoCo 3 keyboard has a few
more keeys that the CoCo 2 one, but was otherwise the same mechanism,
plastic plungers over a membrane contact assembly, backed with a metal
plate. I wa puzzled as to why you feel the CoCo 3 had a much better
keyboard than the 2.
IBM Model M or the keyboard on my Tandy 200 lappytop.
Very little comes close to those :-)
-tony