In article <CANij+deo3in6w9hWaXWUxSk=G9K5y3kLGcXcqQUYJTOmR5zVaw at mail.gmail.com>,
William Donzelli <wdonzelli at gmail.com> writes:
Also
sufficient: source code. Open source has an unconquerable advantage
here, over proprietary.
I do not have complete faith about this in the long term. The open
source folks tend to be a loose group of undisciplined volunteers,
generally not long term thinkers, with only a very small segment
interested in historic preservation.
I think what he means is that open source file formats tend to be less
opaque than others because you have the data definition and the
associated behavior as open source code.
These days I hear people worrying about vendor lockin with their data
formats and choosing open source interchange or data formats for the
very reason that it keeps their intellectual property investment free
of any vendor.
Its still not a majority of people talking about those issues, but
more people talk about it now than before. I know that people who
work on 3D model content think about this quite a bit when they make
their living as a content provider. If their content is locked up in
a binary format specific to one tool vendor, then they can't readily
switch tools or have confidence that their IP investment is accessible
should the tool become unavailable. Sometimes this can simply be that
their license expired and they don't want to renew it just to access
their data.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>