We run HP, IBM,
Sun, Cisco, and Dell hardware, and I
hardly see
ANY of them giving out schematics.
I doubt Tony has any DELLs, but I'm fairly sure he has some
HP kit ... an HP Laserjet iirc.
Actually, I have a _lot_ of HP computers, going right back to their first
desktop computer, the Model 30 calculator (HP9830). I have HP calculators
older than that, of course.
Heck I use an HP handheld calculator all the time. And yes, I have
schematics. Yes, I have the ROM sources. It doesn't bother me that the
latter are often stamped 'NOMAS -- Not Manufacturer Supported --
Recipient agrees not to contact the manufacturer' I am quite capable of
reading and understanding them on my own.
You'll note he said _he_ wouldn't use anything he couldn't
support himself. He's not saying that you should use the
same approach in the office ... that's not where the important
stuff lives!
_Escatly_..
Let's go back to the comment that started this debate. I make no secret
of the fact that I run linux. I considered what was important _to me_ in
an OS : availability of the source code -- not necessarily open-source, a
source license I could afford would be acceptable; the fact that I prefer
a good CLI to a GUI; that it would run the software I need (a C compiler,
TeX/LaTeX, etc) and so on. And I concluded that linux was the best choice
_for me_ so that's what I run.
Now, I don't think it's the best choice for everyone. Other people have
different requirements and desires, they end up with a different OS that
suits their needs. So? Waht's the problem?
IT's the same with many other things. I don;'t suppose many people,
buying a new car, would have the same requirement top-of-the-list as my
father did recently. Namely that the official workshop manual had to be
available. But it was important to us.
-tony