Only in America do pictures of fully clothed women
become porn
somehow.
Not that the US is the only country that needs a reality check. Wasn't
it Australia who arrested someone on child porn charges over a cartoon
of Bart Simpson?
We seem to spend an inordinate amount of time trying
to repress
anything that might even remotely be seen as sexual.
...unless it's an ad, in which case anything that doesn't quite upset
the media-censor bluenoses is fine. You can tell the audience that
drinking your brand of beer will get you laid all you like, provided
you don't put it in so many words or show any "naughty bits"...oh, and
provided the "you" whom the ad implies that of is male and straight.
And various other things, like white....
Yeah, the US does have various issues.
To link this to something actually on-topic, consider the ADAM, from
Logical Machine Corporation. I have a PDF (presumably a scan) of a
brochure for it which, if taken at face value, implies they'd cracked
the natural language understanding and learning problems. Its
relevance here is the cover photo, which shows a woman seated at the
thing, out on a lawn with a backdrop of plants. She's basically facing
the computer, but her head is turned to look at the camera, which is
about at her 4 o'clock. She's holding an apple with a bite taken out
of it up to her mouth...and, by appearances, is wearing nothing but a
pair of glasses. She is, of course, white, long-haired, blonde, and
blue-eyed. And, based on the distortion they (don't) generate, the
glasses - if they have lenses in the frames at all - are quite weak.
It supposedly pulls some 20 amps (110V), requires 60-80 degrees F, but
requires no particular cooling. I have trouble seeing those claims as
mutually consistent.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B