It should also be readily apparent that "Mike Ross" is smugly trying to
make public a private message I sent to him because he feels the need
for group-think protection.
- J.
On 4/26/2015 9:31 PM, Mike Ross wrote:
Sorry, it's possible I replied to the wrong post -
but the true
subject should be readily apparent from the text I quoted.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Paul Anderson<useddec at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I didn't think my reply was out of line in any way. I was not trying to
> insult you or anyone else. I was giving support to a list member who had a
> problem.
>
> Are you sure you are replying to the right person?
>
> And yes, I was factory trained on PDP11/34s and worked on many in the
> field, own several of them.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Mike Ross<tmfdmike at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Your reply to me was less than civil:
>>
>> "s at
cimmeri.com js at
cimmeri.com via
comcast.net
>>
>> 11:14 AM (2 hours ago)
>> to me
>>
>> Do you even HAVE an 11/34 to know what's being talked about? If you
>> did, you'd see that it's not at all clear which way it goes, and it
>> can go on either way. Therefore, it should be checked against a
>> schematic or otherwise pinned out.
>>
>> Since when do YOU speak for "anyone else"?! Speak for YOURSELF.
>>
>> I don't need you and other similar IDIOTS beating up on me because
>> YOU'RE an IDIOT and I'm NOT"
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know who you are. I do question what you're doing on this list
>> with that kind of attitude.
>>
>> Mike