4 Jan
2012
4 Jan
'12
4:30 p.m.
In article <CAMTenCFW8MxcUUBjRPe1K_oD_9TqdYbEhzMCQfJKy6fDXKGerw at mail.gmail.com>,
Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> writes:
On Jan 4, 2012 9:39 PM, "Richard"
<legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
No praise is given, only insults hurled, so it's hard to say. I
merely note that Algol survived unscathed.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 version available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
In article <CAALmim=
8YgJhGOvCXzd2eMjVeoB1G5qk30-YUo25y03iZ7FKJg at mail.gmail.com>,
Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
writes:
Indeed he does. What /did/ he approve of, then? Something he created
himself, perchance? (Did he do so, in fact?) Here's the whole rant:
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/ewd498.html
Wow.
Reading that just lowered my opinion of him, although not substantially.
It reads more like a usenet post to alt.flame than something that
speaks of "truths".
He savages pretty much every au courant language of the time except
Algol.