25 Oct
2016
25 Oct
'16
6:52 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
wrote:
Is there any interest in all this? If so, I can put
together a web page
with
the V6-verion VTServer source, along with the modified V6 serial line stuff
(including a short description of the extended stty/gtty interface), etc.
?Yes please....?
So I guess my next step, if I don't hear shortly from someone who has
previously used VTServer to install V6, is to start on actually getting
a V6 file system created.
?I think there are rk05 images in bit savers, check out uv6swre?
I'm still vacillating over whether it would be better to go V6-style (and
just transfer a complete, small existing V6 filesystem),
?The issue is even at 9600 baud, you do need to download 2.4Mbytes which
will take? a few minutes. So you would need to create a very small root FS
and then you get into how much is enough.
or V7-style (and
get stand-alone 'mkfs', etc running with V6-format file systems). Anyone
have an opinion?
?Basically it depends how many commands you need. Clearly, you need to
V6-afy the V7 standalone system and then for each app you need, you have to
both v6-afy and add the #ifdef STANDALONE hacks. Clearly you need mkfs,
and probably need a one or more other programs in the key of restor, tar,
tp, dd or the like to copy things.
That's going to be a bit a work - although once you have done it, it will
be handy I suspect.
Clem?