In article <FF6AB92D97A23A409701CDBF66F03FCD019DC2EDAD at 505fuji>,
Ian King <IanK at vulcan.com> writes:
IMO that's why eBay did it: since we as a
community would cooperate and (us=
ually) not bid things up to stupid prices, eBay wasn't making enough money =
(uh huh). I find that I shop eBay a lot less now. (Hm, maybe my wife put =
them up to it?) -- Ian=20
Well, knowing that I could contact other bidders or winners never
influenced how much I was willing to spend or how much I bid.
Instead, it allowed me to contact winners and share information with
them or ask them questions about what they ended up winning. Ebay
says that they undertook these measures because of fraud and abuse and
while fraud and abuse were (and are) occurring, obscuring identities
and preventing you from contacting people who bid on/won items is not
the only solution. They could have instituted a double-blind contact
system so that you could still contact winners, but neither party
would know the identity of the other in the communication unless they
chose to reveal it. In other words, they could have solved the
problem without fracturing the community. But essentially ebay has
decided that they are only a community of sellers and that buyers are
second class citizens.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>