26 Sep
2011
26 Sep
'11
4:46 p.m.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 09/26/2011 12:59 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
Heh. It's obviously an attempt at creating lots and lots of vendor
lock-in, and an attempt to be a better Java than Java. The former has
succeeded all over the place.
The thing that has always bugged me about .NET is that MS billed it as
cross-platform, then turned right around and made crucial libraries
Windows-only.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Well the
problem is that both their new Lightswitch& upcoming Visual
Studio 2011 products both fully support the .Net environment. To me, the
only thing that would make .Net better is if the stupid compiler actually
generated native code instead of that runtime crap.
Will people be offended if I call that MS-P-code?
It's obviously for trying to create multi-platform aps.