In article <m1H9RWX-000J0SC at p850ug1>,
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) writes:
And in the case of classic computers, assemnbly-level
spares may well be
unavaialble other than by canivalising another example of the machine.
Which is not a Good Thing.
Ironically Tony, you've attempted to defend your position while
putting out another example of the bias being complained about.
The bottom line is that you state the above as if it were some
scientifically verifiable axiom, when in fact, its just your opinion.
I'm not putting any normative value on the opinion itself, but you
must recognize that just because you consider something to be a "Good
Thing" (or the converse) doesn't mean that other people must share
this same point of view.
I think anyone after a while of reading your posts understands your
position and there's no point in either attacking nor defending it.
It simply is your position, and that's fine.
But at the same time you must recognize that not everyone shares your
view.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>