On Mar 21, 15:24, Jim Strickland wrote:
> Couldn't they be used to divide a termination domain? IE the multiport
> transceiver sits between two branches of a thin-net network, protecting
against
> loss of termination on either branch? Obviously they'd still be in the
same
> collision domain...
I don't really see how the fanout units on offer (or my unsuccessful
back-to-back device) could do that -- the termination isn't in the
transceiver or fanout unit, it's a resistor on the end of the cable.
Anyway, it would still only be one termination domain. Or maybe I've
misunderstood what you mean? If you mean my back-to-back transceiver idea,
yes, if it had worked, you could use it to split a termination domain into
two, just like a two-port repeater, or a very simple bridge (except a
bridge usually separates collision domains too).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
--- Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com> wrote:
> On Mar 21, 21:48, Tony Duell wrote:
> > > else, long before I posted my request. I could fix about anything
> else on
> > > the PET, but I draw the line at grinding the top off to poke at
> individual
> > > flip-flops in an IC :-) FWIW, the first job I had in
> >
> > Really, kids these days.....
>
> Well, I once ripped the metal lids off a few ceramic DRAMs to use them as
> optical image sensors (ISTR an article in BYTE, I think it was, years ago
> about that)
Yes! I just repacked my lidless 4116 chips. I only ever got as far as
cementing slide-mount covers on one and sticking it in an Apple II at the
top of RAM and demonstrating the effect by clearing video RAM then lifting
the lid. Many bits sparkled in when light shone on the chip.
Now that I have a digital camera, I'll have to take pictures (as soon as I
buy/find/make a Mac crossover cable to connect a QuickTake 150 to my Mac).
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
--- Mark Gregory <mgregory(a)vantageresearch.com> wrote:
> I don't know how they got there, but I remember seeing a large pile of
> these Spartans at Active Surplus, on Queen Street in Toronto (well-known to
> any Hogtown hackers) in late '88 or '89. Given Active's inventory policy
> ("If you don't buy it, we'll leave it lying around") they may still be
> there.
If anyone researches this, please let me know.
> From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser(a)oa.ptloma.edu>
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Apple Network Servers
>
>
> > I'm also particulary impressed with the Spartan page on your site (for
> > those in the dark, this was a hardware add-on for the Commodore 64 that
> > turned it into an Apple II):
I was a beta tester for the Spartan in 1985. Somewhere I've still got my
contract with them (all I could find on a casual search of my bookshelves
is a copy of the docs). I have the case for one in the basement; I forget
what happened to the mainboard. I think it died, or else I wouldn't have
stripped the supply for another project.
During my testing, I remember running Enchanter on the Apple CPU and Sorcerer
on the C-64 CPU, typing a command on one, switching to the other and typing
a command there to multi-task the games (since the disks were so slow).
Interesting concept, but about 50% the cost of a real Apple. If they ever
sold any, it would have been to some serious die-hards. Mostly back then,
Apple guys and Commodore guys didn't mix much. Kinda like Atari guys and
everybody else. :-)
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
I just came across a wierd computer box. It is labeled 3com 3server3 and
has a dc-300 cartridge tape drive it it. I haven't opened the box yet. I
looked on the 3com website and it says that it is a PC server from 1984.
Does anyone know anything more?
TIA
Mike
michaelmcfadden(a)sprintmail.com
On Mar 21, 16:45, allisonp(a)world.std.com wrote:
>
> > I would have thought a 2101 was far too small. These are 4kbit chips.
>
> Are these single voltage or multiple? 4k? 22pin? sounds like the
> semi-4600 and NEC D410 parts, a 4k pseudostatic 200ns cycle and access
> under 120ns. I've got a rat load of upd410s. The moto part number
> doesn't compute though.
uPD410 is 18-pin 0.3" width, 4k x 1, with one ~CE line (the MOS Technology
MCS6550 has 2 ~CS and 2 CS lines and it's 0.4" wide). I can't find any
data on a 4600 but I assume it's similar.
If you're asking about the 6550 I'm looking for, yes it is single 5V rail,
but it's 1k x 4 and it's not Motorola. In fact, I'm fairly sure no-one but
MOS Technology made them.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
A friend of mine has a Televideo TS-802H that he is looking to part
with. I was familiar with the machine a few years back, and I'm sure
that it is still in good shape.
If you are interested, contact Dick Hubbard at 619-229-0955. He will be
pleased to hear from anyone who might like the machine.
- don
I don't know how they got there, but I remember seeing a large pile of
these Spartans at Active Surplus, on Queen Street in Toronto (well-known to
any Hogtown hackers) in late '88 or '89. Given Active's inventory policy
("If you don't buy it, we'll leave it lying around") they may still be
there.
Cheers,
Mark.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser(a)oa.ptloma.edu>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: Apple Network Servers
>
>I'm also particulary impressed with the Spartan page on your site (for
those
>in the dark, this was a hardware add-on for the Commodore 64 that turned
it
>into an Apple II): I thought it was just a hardware emulator, but its
feature
>set was really greater than the sum of its parts. Fascinating!
>
>--
>----------------------------- personal page:
http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
> Cameron Kaiser * Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)ptloma.edu
>-- SOFTWARE -- formal evening attire for female computer
analysts. ------------
>
On Mar 21, 14:33, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:
> Thanks Pete, I'll give this a try when I get home tonight. And thanks for
> putting the comments in as well! It's nice to see what's going on, that's
> kind of what I'm after by playing around with this stuff this way.
I've stuffed a few other things on my web site at
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/ODT/
A few of the files are bootstraps taken from handbooks or manuals, but
several of them are little bits of nonsense I wrote when I first
encountered an 11/23, with no OS. Remember I was a beginner and try not to
laugh out loud :-) If you think the syntax is a little non-standard, it's
because I had to write my own cross-assembler and I hadn't used MACRO-11
much then. No, don't ask me for the source. It was so awful I threw it
away :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>::What "is" a network server 500, and what is the upgrade (very unlikely to
>::be worth $200)?
>
>A Network Server 500 is one of Apple's two ill-fated Unix server models.
Not to mention thge _very_ ill-fated Apple Networ Server 300, which never
made it past the prototype stage. My web site, Applefritter, is hosted
on one of these machines.
"The ANS 300 had the same architecture as the 500 & 700, but was intended
to be an easily rack-mounted unit intended for Internet/FTP/Mail/Web
serving, departmental and small database servers, etc, and consequently
less expansion. It has two removable drive bays and one fixed drive
(behind the LCD). Much of the serviceability & security was abandoned for
the sake of size. For instance, there is no obvious way to secure the
drive bays, or the motherboard tray from being removed. The power supply
is fixed and would be slow to field repair. The fixed hard drive mounted
behind the LCD is very hard to reach, etc. The key lock on the front
controls only the "on, lock, service" options, unlike the multiple key
lock controlling those functions plus doors and security on the full size
500/700 units. These issues eventually ceased to be important, however,
as the ANS 300 never shipped.
"Code named Deep Dish, the ANS 300 is essentially an Apple Network Server
without the large drive array. As a consequence, the computer is only
four rack-units high. The logic board is in the bottom of the unit on a
slide-out tray. There are two standard ANS removable trays on the right
side of the unit's front. The Deep Dish also has one fixed internal
drive, and the floppy drive is fixed, as well. Apple also had plans to
produce an external drive array for the machine, reason for the ultrawide
SCSI port above the PCI slots."
If anybody wants more information, see
<http://www.applefritter.com/prototypes/deepdish/>.
Tom
------------------------------Applefritter------------------------------
Apple Prototypes, Clones, & Hacks - The obscure, unusual, & exceptional.
---------------------<http://www.applefritter.com/>---------------------