Will any of you be attending Macworld in SF next week?
Decide a place and time inside or nearby?
I plan to attend at least the first and last days, other days optional
depending on how my cash holds out.
Hi,
I just found a scanned/OCR'd copy of "State of the Art" by Stan Augarten on
the Smithsonian's website. It covers integrated circuits from their creation
right up to the 1980s - the URL is:
<http://smithsonianchips.si.edu/augarten/index.htm>
Some of the pictures are quite neat, as are a few of the little facts - the
origin of ZiLOG's name for one (that's on the Z-80 page).
I also came across the "Silicon Zoo" in my Firefox bookmarks list. It's a
site full of "chip art" - little doodles that chip designers sneaked into the
chip masks.
<http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/>
There are also a few more on the Chipworks site - URL:
<http://www.chipworks.com/gallery/gallery_home.asp>
Later.
--
Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB,
philpem(a)philpem.me.uk | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice,
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI
... Let's organize this thing and take all the fun out of it.
The 960 and 980 are completely different architectures.
980s are fairly conventional 16bit accumulator arch machines
while the 960s were oriented towards process control.
I have one of each.
Rumor has it that Steve Thatcher may have mentioned these words:
>if they allowed it, then they had to support it...
That sounds more like the M$ I know... ;-)
>As for Traveling Software, seeing how I worked for them for five years, I
>don't recall any buyout attempts from Microsoft. Traveling did go through
>hard times and it still around but not as they were back in the 90s.
Do you know of anything remaining from the days when they (you?) made
products for the Tandy Model 100/102/200 / NEC 8201A laptop machines?
Source code especially... ;-) There are still quite a few people
(relatively speaking, of course) using those little critters (me included)...
*Anything* that's still around would be greatly appreciated!
<Shameless Plug>
By the by, the mailing list I run for those laptops has 185 subscribers,
and one tireless Rick Hanson that *still* supports them.
</Shameless Plug>
<Shameless Plug2>
The archives for that mailing list can be found at:
http://ccarchive.30below.com/cgi-bin/wrapper
Right next to the Classic Computer Archive project list archives...
Hint, Hint, Hint -- we could always use more *volunteers* for that!
</Shameless Plug2>
Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger -- SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers
_??_ zmerch(a)30below.com
(?||?) If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
_)(_ disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
> Problem is that if you use them as they were originally intended then
> you'll have problems because nobody else does that.
DEC was very good about using EIA-232 (and EIA-423 and other related
interfaces) the way it was supposed to be used, not the way the pee sea
world uses it.
MS
On Jan 6 2005, 13:48, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
> > Ditto for the serial card driver's HEX file. Finally you type
"PR#6"
> > so output goes to the disk, and you EXEC the two HEX files to
create
> > the actual binary as a disk file. Easy ;-)
>
> Actually, if you type PR#6 you'd issue a reboot to the disk drive ;)
So I would. Hmm.. I'm sure there was a PR#6 somewhere along the line,
though I don't remember why. It was 15 years ago I last did this
stuff.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Are there any significant differences between a TI-960B and TI-980B CPU?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Hi crew. Question about a Gridacase 1520. Is anyone familiar with
these laptops? This is a 286, really good shape. It won't boot, dead
as a doornail. The guy at the thrift shop told me it was working when
it was brought in the day before, now I see that two (or one) chips
are missing from under the flap in the top left right above the
keyboard. I figure they were lifted between dropoff and my buying it.
Any ideas if these chips, which I think are application roms, would
prevent the thing from booting? If so, is there such a thing as a
replacement available from someone here or elsewhere? The thing must
have been the first Toughbook or something, and I'd love to see it
working.
Thanks for any info anyone can share.
(does anyone still need a gmail invite? I have lots. )
Brian Mahoney
On Jan 6 2005, 12:05, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Steve Thatcher wrote:
>
> > the only reason Microsoft would not add binary transfer capability
as an
> > integral part of early DOS is that the people that needed it were
in a
> > small minority. It made no business sense to include features that
they
> > believed that most people really didn't need. Later in DOS, they
did
>
> What? It seems to me they had to do more programming work to prevent
> binary copying to the serial port.
No, actually much less. To make binary transfers work, they'd have had
to change the already-existing methods that they had. To prevent them,
they only had to add an error message and add one more case to a test
for a command-line switch.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
This is the exact same method that's used to initiate the install of ADT,
the Apple Disk Transfer utility that's used to get Apple II disk images over
a serial link to a PC for archiving and use with emulators.
I believe that DOS has something similar which redirects the CTTY device to
COM1: (CTTY=COM1: or something like that). CTTY is the DOS shorthand for the
console terminal (screen and keyboard). Obviously this works only in
text-only DOS.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Pete Turnbull
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 3:19 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Importing binary files without removable storage nor
non-bundled software (was: TKermitFTP
On Jan 6 2005, 9:30, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
> > >And the programmers were not smart enough to figure a way around
this
> > >because...why?
> >
> > It would have been trivial for them to adopt a simple
> > block transfer for serial binary at the begining. I suspect
> > that the reason they didn't do this was that they didn't
> > wan't people to transfer programs from machine to machine.
> Your theory would make sense in an alternate universe where the
floppy
> disk was never invented ;)
I think the reason is simpler than Dwight implies, and more along the
lines of John's comment. Microsoft were in a hurry to make DOS work
for IBM, and there was simply no perceived need to add the
functionality. If you look at CP/M-related and Apple ][ systems, you
see they had (er, have) the same problem: no out-of-band way to signal
end of file. Several versions of kermit for Z80 machines and Apple ][s
therefore come with a little program to talk from a remote machine to
the serial port, start debug or equivalent, and stuff an
ASCII-converted copy of kermit over which debug then saves in
executable format.
I've still got the ASCII HEX files for an Apple ][. As far as I
remmeber there are two ways to get Kermit-65 onto an Apple. The first
way is to type "IN#2" to set he serial card as the input, and then on
the remote machine give the command to send the main file. It starts
with "CALL -151" to jump into the monitor, and then follows that with a
series of lines like "E00:38 A5"... which cause those bytes to be
stored in memory; then it calls the code it's just stuffed in, and that
in turn loads a huge number of much more compact (no addresses, no
spaces) lines, before finally issuing a "3D0G" to get back to BASIC.
Ditto for the serial card driver's HEX file. Finally you type "PR#6"
so output goes to the disk, and you EXEC the two HEX files to create
the actual binary as a disk file. Easy ;-)
The other way is superficially simpler; you type IN#2, transmit a small
file which creates a BASIC program and runs it; that program receives
and saves the two HEX files, and then tells you what to do with them.
Seems slightly simpler, but actually takes a lot longer, as I recall.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf(a)siconic.com>
>
>On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>> >And the programmers were not smart enough to figure a way around this
>> >because...why?
>>
>> It would have been trivial for them to adopt a simple
>> block transfer for serial binary at the begining. I suspect
>> that the reason they didn't do this was that they didn't
>> wan't people to transfer programs from machine to machine.
>> Can you imaging. 1 million people with computers and they
>> only sold one OS.
>
>Hi Dwight.
>
>Your theory would make sense in an alternate universe where the floppy
>disk was never invented ;)
>
Ok, then they had no excuse.
Dwight
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf(a)siconic.com>
>
>On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>
>> Vintage Computer Festival declared on Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:19 pm:
>> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>> > > Dunno, I don't have quite such old versions :-) My old copy of "The
>> > > MS-DOS Bible" says "every version" -- it means 3.30 and older --
>> > > disallows binary reads from devices. The same message is at 5254 in
>> > > MS-DOS 3.30 (ditto in PC-DOS 3.30), at 4CA0 in 3.21, and 4CCC in
>> > > IBM-DOS 4.01 (from a Compaq). I can't read my MS-DOS 2.10 and 2.11
>> > > disks on the hardware I have here. "Binary reads from a device are
>> > > not allowed" is the message at 8753 in DR-DOS 3.41.
>> >
>> > The question I haven't seen answered yet is, "Well, why the hell
>> > not???"
>>
>> Well, my guess would be that it has no way to determine the EOF coming
>> over the line, as it can't just "check the file length", unless there's
>> a ^Z there to indicate it. Thus, ASCII mode is needed.
>
>And the programmers were not smart enough to figure a way around this
>because...why?
Hi
It would have been trivial for them to adopt a simple
block transfer for serial binary at the begining. I suspect
that the reason they didn't do this was that they didn't
wan't people to transfer programs from machine to machine.
Can you imaging. 1 million people with computers and they
only sold one OS.
Dwight
I'm in need of an IPI terminator. I am trying to make a Sun 690MP
usefull and this is the last component in my way.
I'm told this is *not* the same as the d-shell 3-pin-row SCSI
terminators.
Hi
I'm almost sure I'd done this in the past to
get something like laplink running on a remote machine.
I suspect that the code specifically had no ^Z
until the end of the file and it was just a minimum
bootstrap program to load the rest.
One could always edit the file by changing any ^Z to
something else. Once on the new machine, just change them
back.
I do remember that the name of the file couldn't be
.COM or .EXE. I think the copy from COM1: didn't
work for those files names.
Dwight
>From: "Pete Turnbull" <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
>
>On Jan 3 2005, 13:01, John Foust wrote:
>> At 12:41 PM 1/3/2005, you wrote:
>> > It seems like I remember doing something
>> >like "copy COM1: FileName" or something.
>> > It seems like I remember there being an issue
>> >with the file name extention.
>>
>> And perhaps something else about setting the mode of the COM1:
>> port for bits and binary?
>
>You can't, in MS-DOS. COPY uses ASCII transfers for COM ports and
>complains if you try to force binary, because it needs to see a ctrl-Z
>to know where the end-of-file is.
>
>--
>Pete Peter Turnbull
> Network Manager
> University of York
>
I have a VS2000 memory board (the 2 meg upgrade, I think) doing nothing
here, and it needs to go. Anyone want it for a buck and shipping?
William Donzelli
aw288(a)osfn.org
I've finished, and am debugging, a VAX-11/780 simulator, with the goal
of running VMS V1, early BSD releases, and other 'first VAX' code.
There are a couple of critical missing pieces. In particular, I need
1) 780 PROM bootstrap contents. This was the 4KB of PROM located in the
MS780 memory controllers. A binary dump would be sufficient, the
simulator can dissassemble VAX code.
2) LSI11 console PROM contents. The LSI11 console ran out of a boot
PROM. This is less critical but would help with understanding the fine
details of the console-CPU interaction. Again, a binary dump suffices.
3) VMS V1 floppy kit. While early tape distributions have been found,
the console floppies have not. The most critical ones are the tape
restore program and the system bootstrap (VMB). Getting a 780 online
required
- booting the console from its PROM
- loading the standalone tape restore program into the 780 from the
console
- running the standalone tape restore program to copy VMS from the
distribution tape to a hard disk
- loading VMB into the 780 from the console
- using VMB to boot VMS
Any help would be appreciated. The 780 simulator, in its current
incomplete state, is included in the SIMH source distribution,
http://simh.trailing-edge.com.
--
Bob Supnik bob.supnik(a)sicortex.com
VP Engineering Tel: 978.897.0214 x202
SiCortex Fax: 978.461.2444
One Clocktower Place Cell: 508.344.0398
Suite 100
Maynard, Ma 01754
On Jan 5 2005, 15:55, Tom Jennings wrote:
> Hmm. It's clearly obvious that when personal memory, and 30+ lbs.
> of documentation disagree, the printed manuals are all in error.
Absolutely! They change them, you know, when you're not looking. It's
often happened to me :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Thanks alot for your advices and the links, Ethan.
> No. There are 1MB boards for the 11/24, but they are somewhat odd,
> IIRC. I have an 11/24 at home with a KT24 (M7134?) Physical Address
> eXtension (PAX) board that lets you put more than 256K of memory in
> the 11/24, giving it a slight edge over the 11/34, at least in terms
> of max memory (the 11/34C might be able to crunch numbers a bit
> faster).
> I reasonably confident that the 11/24 and 11/44 used the same memory.
> For 256K boards, it should be the M8722 (MS11-MB). Grubbing around on
> http://www.pdp11.co.uk/search/modules.ehtml?name=ms11&submit=Search
> seems to suggest that the 1MB version is the M8743 (MS11-PB), but I
> don't have my hardware close at hand to check my own machines. Max is
> 4MB (as with any 22-bit address bus).
My 11/24 _uses_ the KT24 Mapping Module with the suggested MS11-PB, giving it 1MB of ECC Memory.
I can guarantee, that this combination works :^)
There's another board, I own: a MS11-LB (M7891-BB) with 128kb.
But I suppose that it doesn't make much sense to put this one together with the MS11-PB. The Ms11-PB is certainly
much faster than the MS11-LB.
Unfortuantely, the National Semiconductor boards can't be used, they were built for a VAX 11/750...
Currently, I have some problems to get this baby work.
There is a strange malfunction: When typing in some letters or digits on the keyboard (VT420), the screen turns
out some sort of random characters at the @-pormpt.
It's very weird !
Sometimes, when I turn it off and on to give it another try, it becomes impossible to type something.
The prompt is waiting, the cursor's blinking and the machine try to bootstrap, when pushing the boot-button,
but I simply can't type in anything !
The grant und bus connections are closed. The terminal works perfectly on local mode.
The "Clock" LED is on, in fact, never turns off, while the 1-LED (the one next to the Clock-LED) turns on when the PROM
for the CPU diagnostic is loaded (@165004g).
After that, both LEDs remain on.
The Maintenance Card for the 11/24 isn't on the internet (at least, I didn't find it), and there, the LEDs functions are described.
Could anybody give me some help on this ?
Pierre
________________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt neu bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021193
Hi,
To re-iterate a CCTalk thread I found that was two years old, anyone got
any documentation on one of these things?
(I picked up one off of EPay cheap, in a vague attempt to get some
networking into a IIgs)
I've found this page here:
http://www.walshcomptech.com/fastpath5/
That site had a little software for the FastPath 5, however, I've not
had the opportunity try it out. (None of the Apple boxes I have access
to have any sort of network in them. Powerbook 540c, and of course the
IIgs.)
So, anyone seen any other documentation on the things, on the web?
Thanks!
/me goes back to googling for doc's...
David
> Al, are you indicating that a) your copy of the book has been scanned
correct. I'm not sure I'm comfortable with putting it on line, however.
also, it is a VERY strange book. I pulled it out again just to refresh
my memory about just exactly what they were trying to do with this project
while you could consider it a 'computer', it is not an 'automatic computer'
every switch (all those little things made from paper clips) are operated
manually.
Hi folks,
Happy festive stuff :)
Does anyone have pinouts of the aforementioned chip? I can do the 8500 but
not the 8600 which allowed horizontal movement amongst other things......
Thanks!
--
Adrian/Witchy
Creator/Curator of Binary Dinosaurs, quite probably the UK's biggest private
home computer collection.
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the online museum
www.aaghverts.co.uk - *the* site for letting you moan about adverts!
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - former gothic shenanigans :(
Hi list,
I have here a DEC documentation set for the VT220 (its outer cardboard
cover says VT200, though).
It contains:
VT220 Owner's Manual (EK-VT220-UG-003)
VT220 Installation Guide (EK-VT220-IN-002)
VT220 Programmer Pocket Guide (EK-VT220-HR-002)
It also contains the following:
VAX Language-Sensitive Editor VAX Fortran Pocket Guide (AA-EV45A-TE)
MicroVMS User's Pocket Reference (AA-Z211C-TE)
MicroVMS Programming Pocket Reference (AA-Z214B-TE)
These are all free to whoever wants them (unless any of the Bitsavers
guys need them for scanning, in which case they get first refusal).
You pay shipping.
Usual 21 days before they get recycled, so move fast. Replies by
private mail please.
Ed.
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can get TMS9980 and TMS9901 chips from?
They're never on eBay. I tried a chip broker who had a large stash, but he wanted
200USD per chip!
I'm trying to get my old TM99/U89 system going and the 9980 and 9901 chips have
corroded badly and lost a leg or two.
I've been told the 9980 was in some old pin-ball machines, so I'm currently hunting
down these sites to verify this.
seeyuzz
river
A while ago I asked if anyone on the list could help me get AutoCAD 12 for DOS.
Several people came through and I now have a copy. Thanks, everyone!
As expected though, it doesn't work and play nicely with Windows XP. I was
hoping that just running it through a command prompt window and giving that
giving the Win 95 compatibility attribute to the acad.exe file would make it
work. It didn't and I got a strange error message:
"Phar Lap err 74: Can't use -REALBREAK under this version of DPMI"
So I Google that and found a few threads like this one:
http://discussion.autodesk.com/thread.jspa?threadID=314
Apparently it's just not possible to run Acad 12 in 'real' DOS in XP. I
already knew XP's prompt is nothing close to real DOS, but I was hoping to find
a way to trick the program, or a way to emulate DOS perhaps. Anyone have a
clever solution to this? (I do have a suitable second PC to install real DOS
on, but I'd rather not have to dedicate a whole system just to use one program.)
=====
Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
-- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
-- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
-- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
-- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news(a)computercollector.com
-- 628 readers and counting!
Hey HP fans... Check out item # 5154313481 on ebay.
I have a stash of these, but none I want to get rid of yet. Evenso, I was
tempted by this one.
It's a 2100A, looks to be very good condition, and stuffed with a lot of
really nice cards. The seller put up some really nice photos of the all over
the unit and you can enlarge all of them to read the fine print on all the
card handles.
That system is pretty decked out... 32KW core, several 8-bit dup reg boards,
several CRT interfaces (I'd like one of those). 7970 Mag tape, 13210 (7900A)
disc controller set. Very nice.
If you're not an HP fan, you really should check out the front panel
pictures. Gorgeous - but then I'm biased :>
Jay West
Hi
It is true that capacitors can have nonlinear effects.
In most cases, the design is such that these effects are
vary small and only in cases where the capacitor is used
as a filter parameter that has a sharp cut off, does
this have measurable effects. This means that blindly
replacing all the capacitors is just plain silly.
Speaker wire is another interesting one. All wire
has impedance ( DC and AC effects ). No wire will ever
be the right impedance for an 8 Ohm speaker. Different
speakers are effected differently by the speaker wire.
I've done some AB test with wire and for at least two
speakers, I looked at. I could hear no difference between
6 feet of 12 ga. appliance cord and woven special speaker
wire. I doubt my hearing is good enough today to repeat
such test but at the time my heard was better than average,
being able to clearly hear TV horizontal outputs from any
TV across the room.
Dwight
>From: "Geoffrey Thomas" <geoffreythomas(a)onetel.com>
>
>Electronics World ran a series of articles called " capacitor sound " from
>July 2002.
>-Discussing how capacitor construction can affect the sound of a hi-fi amp.
>The author , Cyril Bateman , also did a few articles on loudspeaker cable
>sound , but I can't find those at the moment.
>
>Geoff.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf(a)siconic.com>
>To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
><cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:31 PM
>Subject: RE: Speaking of eBay
>
>
>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Tom Jennings wrote:
>>
>> > I'll believe anything with sufficient evidence, but solder alloys
>> > in a solder joint sounds like total crap to me -- unless I had
>> > a lot of rolls to offload on fools with more money than I ... :-)
>>
>> That's the thing mainly with these crazy audiophiles. Except for the two
>> examples you bring up, which seems like they have a technical basis to the
>> theory, most of it is just voodoo hocum that doesn't have any underlying
>> technical or scientific basis. One loon comes up with a wacko theory and
>> then it propagates until everyone is demanding special-alloy solder. Why?
>> They don't know, and they don't care. Some guy said it makes the
>> electrons happy so they have to get some too. It's completely naive.
>>
>> I want to see technical treatises explaining WHY, with scientifically
>> executed experiments backed up with empirical data, before I believe any
>> of this nonsense. I think these audio guys ought to demand the same.
>> They might save a few bucks.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
>Festival
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
>http://www.vintage.org
>>
>> [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage
>mputers ]
>> [ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at
>http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 28/12/04
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03/01/05
>
>
>is this the small 50 pin cage thing made by Northern Digital?? or the
>Superpet?
>Mine has a 6502 and 6809 I think - the switch powered
>one cpu or the other...
>h
Hi Heinz,
Yes - this is the little box made by Northern Digital - it was apparently
developed at U or Waterloo. There is only a 6809 inside, and no selection
switch. (My SuperPET does have dual CPUs and a switch to select).
Do you have one with dual CPU's? - Any additional information?
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Greetings, list!
In my quest for the perfect PaperClip PC, I have finally managed to
find a decent snapshot of the book cover:
http://pictures.abebooks.com/EVIANS/402158968.JPG
I was somehow under the impression that the cover was a dull RED, not
light blue; can anyone who has a copy clarify this issue?
TIA,
-dhbarr.
On Jan 4 2005, 13:27, Joe R. wrote:
> >>
> >> >From: "Pete Turnbull" <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >You can't, in MS-DOS. COPY uses ASCII transfers for COM ports
and
> >> >complains if you try to force binary, because it needs to see a
ctrl-Z
> >> >to know where the end-of-file is.
>
> Use COPY /B to force it to do a Binary copy. (FWIW /A forces it to
do an
> Ascii copy).
The point is that you CAN'T use the /B switch when one of the files is
actually a device (like COM:). DOS will not allow that.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
If you want to do that, there is a better way (if you want
to write the C code for it). I use IO.DLL which allows you
to do inp, outp in user space. There are several of these types
of DLLs, but this one seems to be popular:
http://www.geekhideout.com/iodll.shtml
This allows you to port those old dos programs directly over to
XP as a console program. Very handy....
Cheers,
Ram
-----Original Message-----
From: Dwight K. Elvey [mailto:dwight.elvey@amd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 2:09 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: DOS programs in Win XP
Hi
I've been wondering. If I use one of these tools
will it allow me to have things like the bi-directional
control of the parallel port? I use the parallel port
to connect to an older paper tape reader. Does it
really emulate access to hardware or just the more
standard useages like serial ports?
Dwight
>From: "Ram Meenakshisundaram" <RMeenaks(a)olf.com>
>
>Use DosBox or Boch's from XP....
>
>http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/news.php?show_news=1
>
>http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ram
>
>
(c) 2005 OpenLink Financial
Copyright in this message and any attachments remains with us. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If this message is not
intended for you it must not be read, copied or used by you or
disclosed to anyone else. Please advise the sender immediately if
you have received this message in error.
Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of
any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the
recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility
is accepted by Open Link Financial, Inc. for any loss or damage in any
way arising from its use.
Hi
I've been wondering. If I use one of these tools
will it allow me to have things like the bi-directional
control of the parallel port? I use the parallel port
to connect to an older paper tape reader. Does it
really emulate access to hardware or just the more
standard useages like serial ports?
Dwight
>From: "Ram Meenakshisundaram" <RMeenaks(a)olf.com>
>
>Use DosBox or Boch's from XP....
>
>http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/news.php?show_news=1
>
>http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ram
>
>
>Good luck buying a new copy of AutoCAD 12 for DOS from them today. I am not
>even sure what the license stated back then about selling the program to
>another person legally.
I'm not sure it matters what the license said.
Adobe tried the trick of making it against the license to transfer a copy
of their software to a new owner. The courts shot it down the first time
it was tested.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Use DosBox or Boch's from XP....
http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/news.php?show_news=1http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
Cheers,
Ram
(c) 2005 OpenLink Financial
Copyright in this message and any attachments remains with us. It is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If this message is not
intended for you it must not be read, copied or used by you or
disclosed to anyone else. Please advise the sender immediately if
you have received this message in error.
Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of
any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the
recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility
is accepted by Open Link Financial, Inc. for any loss or damage in any
way arising from its use.
Hi
All I can say is that those were the words from the
actual engineers that were working on the problem.
Yes, I do believe the disk had coatings but they
were dry lub ( like Teflon ) and none flowing.
Anything that would flow would quickly destroy the disk.
Any lump on the surface would cause the head to bounce.
Anything that flowed slowly would cause a lump.
Since this doesn't happen, it couldn't be. A smoke
particle is a lump. Dust is usually so large that
the head knocks it out of the way.
Still, they said they solved the problem by making
the surface a little less smooth.
If someone opened a disk and saw lube on the surface,
that disk had a failed bearing seal.
Dwight
>From: "Brad Parker" <brad(a)heeltoe.com>
>
>
>"Joe R." wrote:
>...
>>slide (or rotate) just as easily. I've looked at a couple of drive platters
>>that had sticktion problems and there definitely seems to be wax or
>>something holding the heads to the platters.
>
>I think almost all 3 1/2" drive media has some sort of coating on it.
>What it is varies over time and mfg. I remember that most of it had
>'lubrication like' properties - it's been a long time however and I may
>be slightly off.
>
>I seem to recall the magnetic coating was sputtered on and then another
>coating was put on top. As I remember sometimes the top coating would
>pool around the heads after they landed.
>
>but it's all a dim memory and my memories are probably very dated these
>days since the density has gone up by factor of 1000.
>
>I do remember walking through Tony Lapine's labs and watching watching
>drives running inside laminar flow hoods :-) head balistics where the
>order of the day and made for some interesting firmware.
>
>-brad
>
I have 2 sets of BA23 "skins" (the outer plastic covers) available.
One is complete and undamaged (except for the property marking
described below) - has both side panels, front cover, back cover, and
the base "foot".
The other has everything except the back cover, and the "foot" on this
one has a chunk missing from the middle of one edge, maybe about 4"
long.
Both of them have the name of the organisation they came from marked
on the front panel (under the opening for the drives) using the
"SELECTAMARK" system (blue dots which spell out letters in a
dot-matrix-style font). This can be removed with glasspaper, or if you
don't care you can of course just leave it. I suppose this only really
matters if you want the covers for display/museum purposes.
Best offer (to me by private mail) by the end of 21 days takes them.
Your offer can be from "nothing" upwards - I don't mind if these go
for free, but if they're worth more then obviously I wouldn't mind a
few drinking vouchers ;)
You must pay shipping or collect in all cases.
Ed.
> Anybody have a stupid DOS trick for importing binary files
> over a com: port?
MS DOS came with a program to do that. I dont' recall the exact name, but
it was something about a server (check the DOS directory it will probably
spring out at you). You had to setup one side as a server and one as a
client. I don't recall if you had to do it at boot time or not (I had
boot disks setup for it, so I always did it at boot, but that might have
just been the way I set it up).
I used to use it over parallel, but I'm pretty sure it worked over serial
as well (I think I did parallel simply because it was faster).
If you can't find it, let me know and I'll dig up the name.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
win2K and on will not allow any hardware direct access to hardware. In the DOS days, programs "talked" directly to display cards to bypass BIOS or expected to load their own memory manager (that is the Phar Lap error you are receiving). There are a lot of console programs that will work just fine on XP as long as they access normal BIOS and DOS system calls. AutoCAD is not in that category...
best regards, Steve Thatcher
-----Original Message-----
From: Computer Collector Newsletter <news(a)computercollector.com>
Sent: Jan 3, 2005 11:58 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Slightly OT: DOS programs in Win XP
A while ago I asked if anyone on the list could help me get AutoCAD 12 for DOS.
Several people came through and I now have a copy. Thanks, everyone!
As expected though, it doesn't work and play nicely with Windows XP. I was
hoping that just running it through a command prompt window and giving that
giving the Win 95 compatibility attribute to the acad.exe file would make it
work. It didn't and I got a strange error message:
"Phar Lap err 74: Can't use -REALBREAK under this version of DPMI"
So I Google that and found a few threads like this one:
http://discussion.autodesk.com/thread.jspa?threadID=314
Apparently it's just not possible to run Acad 12 in 'real' DOS in XP. I
already knew XP's prompt is nothing close to real DOS, but I was hoping to find
a way to trick the program, or a way to emulate DOS perhaps. Anyone have a
clever solution to this? (I do have a suitable second PC to install real DOS
on, but I'd rather not have to dedicate a whole system just to use one program.)
Like it says, 7 TK50 media, free to good home. All but one have
handwritten labels. They all have cases.
One has a dot-matrix printed label which says:
"AQ-GL5AJ-DN MB26947
MVII DIAG CUST TK50
COPYRIGHT 1987
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION"
so, a MicroVAX 2 diagnostics tape.
Free to whoever wants them, you pay shipping. Please speak up (by
private mail) within 21 days if you want them.
Ed.
If anyone is interested in a nice enclosed 19" rack (5.5 feet tall with
a door, etc. I think it's on casters) it's free for the asking in the
SF Bay Area. Just email me if you have an interest and I'll put you in
touch with the guy that has it.
Erik Klein
www.vintage-computer.comwww.vintage-computer.com/vcforum
The Vintage Computer Forum
It is worth something to me, but at the moment my budget is rather tight. I
didn't mean to 'whine' about it, I was just excited to see such a complete
piece for sale, and was surprised when you bought it. I didn't mean for you
to buy something you didn't want.
I'd say the complete documentation (the stuff in the binder) is worth around
$60 to me, but I don't have any extra money to spend right now.
In about a month I should have enough. I'll e-mail you then.
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu_(a)t_hotmail.com
lord_nightmare_(a)t_users.sf.net
(replace _@t_ with @)
>>>>I hope to see the whole thing scanned (and I want to see the scans too).
>>>And this information is worth how much to you?
>>I was hoping to get scans of the *ENTIRE* Votrax PSS manual
--
>Perhaps you are not a native English speaker.
>I just spent over $200 for something I was not particularly interstested
>in because you were whining on this mailing list about wanting the
>documentation.
>I am not going to put this information up on bitsavers for free. If you
>feel
>this is worth something to you, put up or shut up.
"Joe R." wrote:
...
>slide (or rotate) just as easily. I've looked at a couple of drive platters
>that had sticktion problems and there definitely seems to be wax or
>something holding the heads to the platters.
I think almost all 3 1/2" drive media has some sort of coating on it.
What it is varies over time and mfg. I remember that most of it had
'lubrication like' properties - it's been a long time however and I may
be slightly off.
I seem to recall the magnetic coating was sputtered on and then another
coating was put on top. As I remember sometimes the top coating would
pool around the heads after they landed.
but it's all a dim memory and my memories are probably very dated these
days since the density has gone up by factor of 1000.
I do remember walking through Tony Lapine's labs and watching watching
drives running inside laminar flow hoods :-) head balistics where the
order of the day and made for some interesting firmware.
-brad