>
> From: Ken Seefried <seefriek at gmail.com>
> Subject: i860: Re: modern stuff
> >the i860 found at least a little niche on graphics boards, so somehow
> >not a complete failure ;-)
>
>
I have a Quad-i860 VME board in one of my Sun systems.
Michael Thompson
Is there anyone who has a working DEC Pro 350 who would be prepared to probe
a few pins on the system board with an oscilloscope? I'd like to understand
what signals I should be expecting in the reset logic, which seems to be
quite complex.
Thanks
Rob
At 04:29 PM 10/29/2018, geneb via cctalk wrote:
>There's a ton of them on the IA already. I would /love/ to get the early ones. My collection begins at 1997 so I would *eagerly* take anything previous to that.
Oh, I'd guess I have them all from '94 to 97 at least,
including the non-Intel MIPS and Alpha sets.
Does the Internet Archive had an easy tool that lets me put a CD
in my drive and it'll tell me if they already have it?
- John
Actually I just fixed it ;) <Emily Litella> Never Mind.
I took the supply all the way apart and found one secondary filter cap that
had leaked electrolyte. Cleaned and fixed that, but still no luck. 155 volts
on the main filter cap. Then I noticed that occasionally it would try to
start for a blink but then the voltages would just drop to zero. So I
started looking around the section that had to be for bootstrap power to the
switching regulator, a common TL494 chip with datasheets online. Sure
enough, a small electrolytic on the primary side had blown its bottom out.
The diodes around it were still good. Changed that cap and a couple more
suspicious looking small ones and the voltages came right up (including the
24V once I pushed the cover-open microswitch).
Put it back in the printer, screwed it all together (a very modular design
for easier field servicing) and fired it up. Test page printed perfectly.
Saved some $ on a new laser printer. For now :)
I like these old cinder-block-sized (and weight) printers too. They last
ALMOST forever...
Charles
The main power supply for my ancient Laserjet IIp+ printer has given up.
Fuse is not blown. Power switch has continuity... don't feel like trying to
debug and repair the "brick".
There are two Sony labels: One says Model RG1-1782 (I think that's the HP
part number) and the other Model CD-91A, 100-115V.
Does anyone have a working one in their junkbox?
This is the LAST time I repair it before it goes to the recycler! I think
I've changed every module except this one.
It has become my grandfather's axe: new head and new handle, but it's still
my grandfather's axe :)
thanks
Charles
Thursday I visited Computer Fusion near Dallas, TX. They have 2 huge
warehouses that they have been filling up since the 1990s. I saw a lot of
old Sun gear, lots of 90s era PCs, etc. Not all of it is listed on his site,
but if there is something specific you want, go to http://www.cfusion.com
and send them a request. Yes, he still has working ESDI, MFM, etc drives J
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
830-370-3239 cell
sales at elecplus.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
When we talked about this little bit ago I thought there were
a couple other people who had them.? Any chance someone
has a copy of the utilities disk they could rip and email to me?
I just tried to read? mine and it appears to have a bad spot
right on the oct.sav file which is the program for configuring
the card.
bill
> From: Al Kossow
> CHM has a rather large Intel Paragon system.
> I just recently snagged the software and manuals for it on eBay
> which we didn't have
Excellent! Congratulations!
So, I'm curious - what's the 'most important missing thing' at the
CHM - either am important machine that you don't have at all, or
part of something (like the above) that you really need to complete
something?
Noel
Anyone interested in three hardbound volumes of ACM CALGO, starting with
Algorithm 1, plus a large looseleaf binder and
assorted microfiche (assuming that I can still find them)?
Drop me a line if so.
--Chuck
If any of you are archiving old data for the public, like CD-ROMs or
whatever, and you are low on disk space.... A friend gives me surplus
data center hardware often, and I have some SATA disks. They have 4 years
or so on them so backup / redundancy is important, but I can offer
some to people that are running public archives of classic computer stuff
to help.
You just can't resell the hardware.
--
: Ethan O'Toole
Seeking User Manual for DEC M1710 Unibus Interface Foundation: I have been looking everywhere, without success. The closest I have come is a 3-page description in a DEC Logic Handbook from bitsavers.
Thanks in advance for any leads. Neil
I would like to make a correction: Paul Allen helped to create
Micro-Soft not MicroSoft as I had written. When trying to preserve
computing history it's really not permissable to make such an
error.(It's the prof. in me!)
Happy Computing!
Murray :)
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> How many graphical Unix desktops are sold or distributed in the world
> today that are not Linux? Excluding Mac OS X as I specifically address
> that point, I think.
I am replying to this email on a FreeBSD 10.3 box and Motif. I don't
know what FreeBSD runs out of the box because I immediately delete it
and install Motif.
FreeBSD may not have the installed base of Linux but it has a its fans.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV : "...underneath those tuques we wear,
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : our heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
> From: Paul Koning
> A lot more comes from the CPU architecture. The instruction set, of
> course (arguably the first RISC).
An observation about RISC: I've opined before that the CISC->RISC transition
was driven, in part, by the changing balance of CPU speed versus memory
speed: with slow memory and fast CPUs, it makes sense to get as much
execution bang out of every fetch buck (so complex instructions); but when
memory bandwidth goes up, one needs a fast CPU to use it all (so simple
instructions).
It occurs to be that the same balance probably applies to memory _size_. When
memories are small, one wants dense code (which probably means CISC); only
with larger memories does RISC, with its less-dense code, make sense.
Noel
> Message: 28
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 13:16:44 -0400
> From: "Jeffrey S. Worley" <technoid6502 at gmail.com>
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: "Object Oriented GUI"
> Message-ID: <01e83dac0a96469e425a0632bd07319351c9362d.camel at Gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I used OS/2 from 1993 to 2003 almost exclusively. It has the most
> beautiful GUI on the planet, is object-oriented to a fault, and is the
> target of all the claims Microsoft was making with regard to the
> Object-orientedness of their new windows 95.
>
> Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_Shell mentions some
> important attributes of a truely object-oriented gui.
>
> Someone mentioned inheritance and polymorphism. These are two products
> of true object oriented gui design. Applications inherit the ability
> to manipulate and use whatever objects exist in the system. A word
> processor is not limited to just text files, for example, or to only
> the files the programmer originally set out for it. The system allows
> the applications to grow in functionality as new object types are
> developed/assembled by other applications or the user.
All these years later, I'm still trying to wrap my head around what
the purpose of that in an OS/desktop environment/file-manager context
is. I guess that, say, you could have new file types implement their
own methods for things like printing, so the OS doesn't have to know
the details of the document structure or require a particular
application installed to be able to print it, but this seems like an
awfully limited use case to me - sure, it would be nice to have things
like audio and video codecs be universal and pluggable or things like
that, but I have a hard time seeing how it's all that revolutionary,
and I can easily see it being just as limiting as other non-OOP format
standards (after all, it's not going to magically add functionality
that the file format itself doesn't support, is it? And doesn't it
ultimately just come down to diking out a chunk of the application
code for the OS to use? What if two different programs both offer
their own handlers for the same file type?)
Does anyone have copies of these two manuals?
24612-90010 Introduction to the A-Series Computer Diagnostics Manual
24612-90013 A-Series Diagnostic Operating and Troubleshooting Manual
They are referenced in this manual:
RTE-A Primary System Software Installation Manual
92077-90038, April 1995, Rev 6200
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/hp/1000/RTE-A/92077-90038_RTE-A_PrimInst.pdf
The hpmuseum.net site has some older versions of the 24612 manuals,
which date from 1983. The final versions of those manuals would be
nice to have.
My jaw dropped when I saw this:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/223201002247?ul_noapp=true
It looks nice externally, and it has the pedestal, which is nice, but the
seller has not even give the spec or posted pics of the innards and it is
"untested". At that price I would expect a bit more information..
As it happens, I am trying to fix my 350 at the moment.
Regards
Rob
> From: Chuck Guzis
> Danny Hillis' CM-1 also used lots of 1-bit processors.
Does anyone know why they didn't catch on? Was it something like 'commodity
'ordinary' processors became so cheap one could build large parallel machines
out of them, and each node had a lot more computing capability', or something
like that?
I wonder how many CM's are still in existence at this point?
Noel
The boot ROMs for uPDP-11 contain loaders for XH (ethernet) was there any
kind of standard for the server?
It tries to load from a MOP DL server and I have modified mopd from NetBSD
to respond and load 2.11bsd a.out. So I have a solution, but was curious if
there was some DEC standard.
I am tossing a pile of old PC keyboards but found one SUN type C keyboard.
It's missing a few keys :-( but might interest anyone needing spare parts.
Missing
Find/Cut left keypad
"."/Suppr on right keypad
"c" key is missing
one foot is missing
I'll ship if you pay postage.
- Diane
--
- db at FreeBSD.org db at db.nethttp://artemis.db.net/~db
This was circulating in 1995/6. IBM had been shipping the very good
OS/2 for some years and Microsoft was trying to catch up. Someone did
a very nice parody.
Jeff
*****The Legend of the Pea Sea*****
Long ago, in the days when all disks flopped in the breeze and the
writing of words was on a star, the Blue Giant dug for the people the
Pea Sea. But he needed a creature who could sail the waters, and would
need for support but few rams.
So the Gateskeeper, who was said to be both micro and soft, fashioned a
Dosfish, who was small and spry, and could swim the narrow sixteen-bit
channel. But the Dosfish was not bright, and could be taught few
tricks. His alphabet had no A's, B's, or Q's, but a mere 640 K's, and
the size of his file cabinet was limited by his own fat.
At first the people loved the Dosfish, for he was the only one who
could swim the Pea Sea. But the people soon grew tired of commanding
his line, and complained that he could neither be dragged nor dropped.
"Forsooth," they cried, "the Dosfish can only do one job at a time, and
of names he knows only eight and three." And many of them left the Pea
Sea for good, and went off in search of the Magic Apple.
Although many went, far more stayed, because admittance to the Pea Sea
was cheap. So the Gateskeeper studied the Magic Apple, and rested
awhile in the Parc of the XerOx, and he made a Window that could ride
on the Dosfish and do its thinking for it. But the Window was slow, and
it would break when the Dosfish got confused. So most people contented
themselves with the Dosfish.
Now it came to pass that the Blue Giant came upon the Gateskeeper, and
spoke thus: "Come, let us make of ourselves something greater than the
Dosfish." The Blue Giant seemed like a humbug, so they called the new
creature Oz II.
Now Oz II was smarter than the Dosfish, as most things are. It could
drag and drop, and could keep files without becoming fat. But the
people cared for it not. So the Blue Giant and the Gateskeeper promised
another Oz II, to be called Oz II Too, that could swim fast in the new,
32-bit wide Pea Sea.
Then lo, a strange miracle occurred. Although the Window that rode on
the Dosfish was slow, it was pretty, and the third Window was prettiest
of all. And the people began to like the third Window, and to use it.
So the Gateskeeper turned to the Blue Giant and said, "Fie on thee, for
I need thee not. Keep thy Oz II Too, and I shall make of my Window an
Entity that will not need the Dosfish, and will swim in the 32-bit Pea
Sea."
Years passed, and the workshops of the Gateskeeper and the Blue Giant
were many times overrun by insects. And the people went on using their
Dosfish with a Window; even though the Dosfish would from time to time
become confused and die, it could always be revived with three fingers.
Then there came a day when the Blue Giant let forth his Oz II Too onto
the world. The Oz II Too was indeed mighty, and awesome, and required a
great ram, and the world was changed not a whit. For the people said,
"It is indeed great, but we see little application for it." And they
were doubtful, because the Blue Giant had met with the Magic Apple, and
together they were fashioning a Taligent, and the Taligent was made of
objects, and was most pink.
Now the Gateskeeper had grown ambitious, and as he had been ambitious
before he grew, he was now more ambitious still. So he protected his
Window Entity with great security, and made its net work both in
serving and with peers. And the Entity would swim, not only in the Pea
Sea, but in the Oceans of Great Risk. "Yea," the Gateskeeper declared,
"though my entity will require a greater ram than Oz II Too, it will be
more powerful than a world of Eunuchs."
And so the Gateskeeper prepared to unleash his Entity to the world, in
all but two cities. For he promised that a greater Window, a greater
Entity, and even a greater Dosfish would appear one day in Chicago and
Cairo, and it too would be built of objects.
Now the Eunuchs who lived in the Oceans of Great Risk, and who scorned
the Pea Sea, began to look upon their world with fear. For the Pea Sea
had grown and great ships were sailing in it, the Entity was about to
invade their Oceans, and it was rumored that files would be named in
letters greater than eight. And the Eunuchs looked upon the Pea Sea,
and many of them thought to immigrate.
Within the Oceans of Great Risk were many Sun Worshippers, and they had
wanted to excel, and make their words perfect, and do their jobs as
easy as one-two-three. And what's more, many of them no longer wanted
to pay for the Risk. So the Sun Lord went to the Pea Sea, and got
himself eighty-sixed.
And taking the next step was He of the NextStep, who had given up
building his boxes of black. And he proclaimed loudly that he could
help anyone make wondrous soft wares, then admitted meekly that only
those who know him could use those wares, and he was made of objects,
and required the biggest ram of all.
And the people looked out upon the Pea Sea, and they were sore amazed.
And sore confused. And sore sore. And that is why, to this day, Ozes,
Entities, and Eunuchs battle on the shores of the Pea Sea, but the
people still travel on the simple Dosfish.
I am trying to trace the reason why the CPU on my Pro 350 is apparently
being constantly reset. I have reached a DEC 8640 chip. Does anyone have a
pinout for it, perhaps even a datasheet, so I can understand what it is
supposed to do and whether the pin is an input or an output?
Thanks
Rob
> From: Rob Jarratt
> DEC 8640 chip. Does anyone have a pinout for it, perhaps even a
> datasheet,
That's almost certainly a DS8640; a quad NOR unified bus receiver. Data
sheets for the are readily available.
Noel
I used OS/2 from 1993 to 2003 almost exclusively. It has the most
beautiful GUI on the planet, is object-oriented to a fault, and is the
target of all the claims Microsoft was making with regard to the
Object-orientedness of their new windows 95.
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_Shell mentions some
important attributes of a truely object-oriented gui.
Someone mentioned inheritance and polymorphism. These are two products
of true object oriented gui design. Applications inherit the ability
to manipulate and use whatever objects exist in the system. A word
processor is not limited to just text files, for example, or to only
the files the programmer originally set out for it. The system allows
the applications to grow in functionality as new object types are
developed/assembled by other applications or the user.
I gather, though I have not had the opportunity to play with it, that
the Next Gui was also extreme in its object-orientedness, though I
can't see that from MACOS (its inheritor), I understood that to be the
case?
At any rate, if you want a fantastic example of a object-oriented
graphical user interface, check out the Workplace Shell.
Jeff
I just rescued a Cossor DIDS-400 terminal from ending up at the garbage dump. Cossor was a UK company, that ended up as a Raytheon subsidiary, and the Cossor DIDS-400 was marketed as the Raytheon DIDS-400 in the US.
My terminal is model no 402-2/C15, part no D/GA 800260, serial no 023, option table code 321121.
Date codes on the IC?s are in 1968. Internally, there?s some interesting technology; ITT MIC9xx DTL IC?s, a piano wire delay line for character storage, and a Raytheon Symbolray monoscope tube as the character generator.
I?d love to get this terminal working again, and to that end I?m looking for any kind of service documentation (any other documentation would be welcome too, as I have nothing).
The power supply in this terminal consists of two parts, manufactured by Best Products Ltd, of Felixstowe, Suffolk, models 508-L (low voltage supply), and 508-H (high-voltage supply). Any documentation on these would be most welcome, too.
Kind regards,
Camiel Vanderhoeven
Has anyone seen a source for these clips?
http://bitsavers.org/mysteries/salea_clip.JPG
They come with the Salae logic analyzer, and are like the HP logic analyzer clips
in that the wire is detachable, instead of the common style you can buy
where you have to solder on a wire.
On 10/27/18 4:51 PM, corey cohen wrote:
>
>> On Oct 27, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/27/18 4:19 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>>> Has anyone seen a source for these clips?
>>>
>>> http://bitsavers.org/mysteries/salea_clip.JPG
>>>
>>> They come with the Salae logic analyzer, and are like the HP logic analyzer clips
>>> in that the wire is detachable, instead of the common style you can buy
>>> where you have to solder on a wire.
>>
>> Pomona 5790?
>>
>>
>
> I thought I saw some that would work at Halted/HSC in Santa Clara this past week. They were right across from the counter where you pay.
>
There's also these "micrograbber" clips at All Electronics for $2 the each:
https://www.allelectronics.com/item/mtc-9b/micrograbber-test-clip-w/0.64mm-…
I don't like them as much as the Pomonas--the cheapies use only a single
contact, rather than the "pincer" style of the Pomona.
--Chuck
So, I bought a copy of the FP11-A Technical Manual (EK-FP11A-TM), but when it
got here, it was the 'Preliminary' version (-PRE), with type-written text,
some of the figures are hand-drawn, etc.
This manual does not seem to be generally available online, although at one
point a copy was available for download briefly; although it's not the
greatest scan job, I have put it up here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/dload/EK-FP11A-TM-002.pdf
So, is it worth my scanning the -PRE version, or should I just punt, and we'll
go with that scan of the -002?
Noel
> From: Rob Jarratt
> The chips where I believe the RESET is oscillating on pin 23 have been
> labelled E151 and E152 ... But I am not really sure if I have
> identified them and the pin correctly.
E151 is the main CPU chip:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/F-11_chip_set
E152 is the KEF11-A floating point chip, and E150 is the KTF11-A memory
management chip.
Pin 1 of E150 is definitely in the lower left corner (in the photo); there's
an indent on the left-hand side of the chip, for the usual DIP orientation.
I'm pretty sure the other two have the same orientation.
Noel
One the original PDP-8 ("Straight 8"), the front panel has two aluminum
strips on the sides, one on the left and one on the right. Each should have
a pair of flathead countersunk screws, likwly Phillips head.
Can someone tell me the exact specs, basically thread, length, head, and
material of the screws?
Thank you.
--
Will
> I'm pretty sure the other two have the same orientation.
They do; I looked at the KDF11-A prints in the /23 print set, and then looked
at an actual /23. (I should put a hi-res picture of one on the CHWiki page;
the one that's there is pretty miserable.)
Noel
Does anyone have a description of how to put 48K of memory in
the TRS-80 Model I without using an Expansion Interface?? I seem
to remember there being some published back in the old days
but can't find anything on the web.? I think it was done with 4164's
and a few pieces of wire wrap wire to jumper the missing address
lines.
bill
As I mentioned in an earlier thread, I am trying to repair a DEC
Professional 350 system board. I think I know the pinout of the F11 chips
>from a KDF11-A printset, can anyone confirm that pin 23 of the DIL package
is the RESET signal? If that is correct then it is oscillating and resetting
the machine constantly. I am trying to trace the source, but it seems to go
through quite a few chips and I haven't yet traced its source.
The chips where I believe the RESET is oscillating on pin 23 have been
labelled E151 and E152 in the following photo:
https://rjarratt.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/system-board-labelled.jpg But I
am not really sure if I have identified them and the pin correctly.
Thanks
Rob
PS:
> Not the simplest machine to implement, mind - the -8 is a lot
> simpler.
As a rough measure of how much more complex, the -8/E and -11/20 are roughly
contemporaneous, and built out of the same technology (SSI TTL on larger
boards): the -8/E CPU is 5 quad boards, and the -11/20 CPU is 9 quad board
(equivalents - some are duals, etc).
Noel
I rescued a pile of DAT and a drive from scrap locally. I have no use for it.
I'd rather not ship :-( but I am two hours drive from Montreal 4.5-5 hours from
Toronto here in Ottawa. Anyone want this box?
Diane
--
- db at FreeBSD.org db at db.nethttp://artemis.db.net/~db
Liam Proven wrote:
<snip>
>On the one hand, the cosmetics. *Every* Unix desktop out there draws
>on Win95.
I take exception to the "*Every*" in Liam's statement above.
Replacing "Unix" with "Linux" would make the statement more correct.
X-Windows-based desktop metaphor UI's existed within the Unix world long before Win95 came on the scene.
The whole desktop metaphor UI existed long before Windows 95 in non-Unix implementations by Xerox PARC (Palo Alto Research Center) with the pioneering Xerox Alto, introduced in 1973, which implemented Alan Kay's concepts for the desktop metaphor that were postulated in 1970 using Smalltalk as the core operating system.
Windows 95, and the earlier versions of Microsoft's desktop metaphor UI's, were patterned after these implementations. Microsoft simply took concepts that already existed in the world of UI design, and made their own implementation based on those concepts.
-Rick
--
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
I got a request for a scan of the Micro Peripherals Inc MPI 91/92 Product
Manual. I have the manual, I will scan it and post if no one has a copy.
But I don't want to go through the effort if it exists somewhere already.
I noticed on bitsavers there was no MPI nor Micro Peripherals Inc section
so it very well may be that there is no copy of this manual out there..
Thanks in advance.
Bill
Has anyone modified Warren's VTServer to ignore errors (or at least keep
trying upon encountering them)?
I'm trying to image some rl02s I found and am getting flack on some tracks,
killing the whole recovery process.
200K received
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrl(0,0,0)
err cy=14, hd=0, sc=28, rlcs=104275, rlmp=4
Copying done. Either reset the system, or hit
<return> to exit the standalone program.
Or is there a better way?
thx
jake
To draw out the schematics for the Displaywriter I have a bunch of boards to trace out,
and I don't want to do the usual "scribble on yellow pad"
to do it. Has someone written a graphical tool for doing this?
What I would like to find is a tool that puts up a bunch of footprints with internal IC functions
shown, then a way to rapidly enter the buzzed out interconnections, generating a netlist.
This is exactly backwards workflow from normal schematic entry and pcb layout.
I suspect I'm just going to have to bite the bullet and write it..
Kobo have a quite plain Linux, run on iMX processors, and are very easy to
modify/script, and last but not least, to unbrick in case of severe
problems.
In many models, the internal memory is an SD card, so it can be expanded
easily.
Then you have also external SD.
On the software side, try koreader.
It's an open source reader, developed for eink devices.
It works very well with PDFs, and can do intelligent text reflow, even on
raw scans of books, via a sort of OCR.
The nice thing is that it doesn't convert bitmap to text, but seems to
split long lines of text in shorter sections, then rearranges the pieces on
the screen, following font size options.
It can be instructed to work as expected on multi column pages.
Very nice!
Andrea
Greetings all...
I have been pondering something and would love to receive feedback from
you.? The thing
is, I would like to have something pdp8-ish that would allow me to play
a little bit
with the programming languages that were available for these machines,
FORTRAN 4K and
FORTRAN IV in particular.? Now,? I would love to be able to time some
FORTRAN jobs just
to get an idea about what it was like back then.? I am aware of PiDP-8,
simh, as well as
SBC6120, SBC6120RBC.
I happen to have three VT78 cpu boards (sans the RAM board) and two
vt278 cpu boards.
All were in rather sorry condition; I picked them up from a junk pile
that was stacked
several feet high and in which the contents were mostly random. Thus,
the VT78 boards'
components were scratched and in fact two of them are missing the
control panel ROM chip.
Otherwise they are complete, but I am missing the RAM boards.? The VT278
boards
were further abused by someone who yanked out the oscillators and a few
TTL chips,
damaging several traces, which I have now repaired.? Alas, only one of
them has the
HM6120 cpu chip, and I do not know if it is good or not. Both are
missing the SMC5037
CRT generator chip.? Other than that, they are complete.
So, now that we all know what I have, let me say out loud what I've been
thinking:
If I try to build actual hardware:
I've read that the VT278 has serious software compatibility issues with
older software
due to the use of the HM6121 I/O chip.? So even if I get an adequate
keyboard, buy the
CRT chip and manage to use it to drive a monitor, I would need an
original floppy drive
system and media, because I do not have the DP278 serial comms board
that would allow me
to send the VT278 a program to run;
For the VT78, I would need to hack a memory board, and, since it can be
coaxed to accept
a program to run if it is fooled into thinking that it is loading a
program from an
MR78/paper tape, perhaps I could make it boot something.? I would need
to wire-up
and arduino or something like it to translate the keyboard and display
terminal
chatter in the serial console into something usable.? But, that's three
hardware
projects (memory board, MR78-like contraption, microcontrolled serial
console
translator)...
The last hardware option is to go and make an SBC6120RBC;? I would need
to buy
programmers for the GAL/PAL devices, and I've heard that not all
programmers can deal
with the kind of chips used in it.? And, if it turns out that the HM6120
chip that I
have is bad, I would have to hunt down one of those rare beasts.. It
would be awesome, though,
to have an SBC6120RBC up and running, and be able to time actual
hardware running
FORTRAN.
And then comes the emulation option, with the PiDP-8.? I have to say
that the emulation
of the blinkenlights is very, very attractive to me, and this option is
a no-brainer
hardware-wise.
So...? am I missing something in my estimation of the effort involved in
these options?
What would _you_ do?
Carlos.
Anyone have any manuals or software for an ACE 1600? Or manuals for an ADES
hard drive? I've had this one in storage for a while, but it seems fairly
interesting and possibly complete.
http://imgur.com/a/KR83Okw
Thanks,
Kyle
Message: 103
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:46:35 -0700
From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Not really vintage computing, but just in case it's of
interest to anyone..
Message-ID: <8e90dfc4-8cc2-9d33-9031-52ad4690e76c at bitsavers.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 10/24/18 1:08 AM, Evan Linwood via cctalk wrote:
> taken from the listing :
>
> "It was used ( I Believe ) to process Geophysical Seismic Data during the exploration of Oil in Bass Straight. The circuitry is all NASA standard."
>
> https://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/gosford/other-electronics-computers/vintage…
>
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?66273-I-am-putting-the-CART-befor…
Thanks Al - I hadn't seen that. Hopefully something is still happening with it.
I recently came across an eight-volume set of comb-bound, A4-sized
booklets titled "UNIX - An Open Solution", by Mick Farmer and Richard
Murphy. In trying to uncover more info about them, I found Mick
Farmer's old home page: http://www.plan7.co.uk/mick.html.
The books are mentioned there with the text "videos and workbook".
Has anyone seen the videos from these lessons, or know where they
could be found?
Mr. Farmer's email is listed on the page - I can check with him if
nothing turns up here.
- j
Here is a great example of why the keyboards and terminals are getting
separated
https://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-3101-beam-spring-keyboard-purchased-new-in-198…
Note the price $2000 so far. How could one blame the seller. I wonder if
this is the terminal I sold to a buyer in California years ago when I sold
my Series/1 computer. All he wanted was the terminal, I donated the rest
to what was the MARCH museum. At the time I remember having a few words
with the buyer who would not also take the Series/1 system (2 racks) or the
manuals.
There is a naked terminal up for grabs if you're out his way.
Bill