A friend and I went in on an Amiga 4000T haul last weekend, and with it
were some nice hard binder and box Microware OS-9 68x00 books. I want to
say there are two sets of two, and then some binders with photocopied
style paperwork for BASIC.
Is there any Microware fans that might want these? We were planning to
put most of the Amiga software up on eBay to cut down the cost of the
aquisition since it's mostly boring accounting/word processing stuff.
There are no disks with these manuals, just looking to find them a new
home.
Can get more details if anyone is interested.
--
: Ethan O'Toole
Finally got around to imaging the +/- 80 floppies that came with my ACI-90 Pascal Microengine system.
Disks of general interest can be downloaded on ftp://ftp.dreesen.ch/WD9000/MicroEngine.zip
These are mostly variants of the OS and a set of system selftests.
Image SYSTEM/OS_F0_SingleDensity.IMD might be of particular interest as that is a single-density OS-disk, might be needed for those with very early systems. All others images are for double-density systems.
Sorry for the lack of documentation, I don have anymore than this, and have yet to check the contents...
As a sidenote, all BASF disks were unproblematic, unlike the ControlData and noname parts that were also in the mix.
Jos
On another forum, a JW Early did a lot of magazine scans. ?I'll look to see if I saved any of his descriptions. ?My memory, ?he scanned twice, once for line and text, and again for images.
-------- Original message --------
From: Guy Dunphy via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: 01/01/2019 01:29 (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: On Scanning
This may be a good place to mention a text I began writing some while ago:
On Scanning.
? http://everist.org/temp/__On_scanning.htm
Meant to be a 'how to' about scanning and post-processing techniques, written as I
explored that myself. It's not finished because I was working on a solution to the
'screened images with overlaid sharp text' post-processing problem, when sidetracked.
As often happens with me. Also that project diverged into the whole text encoding
thing. Which I can't discuss, but I *can* discuss scanning issues.
Anyway, any comments, corrections and suggestions for extra material are welcome.
Oh, and those with an interest in Apple history may find this amusing:
? http://everist.org/NobLog/20181001_missing_wave.htm
Guy
Y
> From: Paul Koning
>> I haven't sat down with -C and -D manuals and done a bit-by-bit
>> compare. I just did that (I used the "RK11-C Moving Head Disk Drive
>> Controller Manual", DEC-11-HRKA-D, and the 1976 "Peripherals Handbook"),
>> and found in the following:
>> In the RKDS: bit 7 has changed the definition slightly ("Drive Ready"
>> to "R/W/S Ready"), but seems to be basically the same.
> You mean bit 6? Bit 7 is "drive ready" in both.
@*#$@*$%@&*!!!!! My silverfishionado nature screwed me! I didn't have an
RK11-D manual in paper, so I relied on the "Peripherals Handbook" - and it's
got an error!
In both the 1975 and 1976 edition, the _diagram_ for the RKDS shows bit 7 as
"R/W/S Ready", and bit 6 as "Access ready", but the _table_ shows bit 7 as
"Drive Ready", and bit 6 as "R/W/S Ready"! OK, so let me ditch that, since
it's self-contradictory, and thefore necessarily erroneous.
I'll switch to the RK11-D User's Manual, EK-RK11D-OP-001. It gives bit 7 as
"Drive Ready", and bit 6 as "R/W/S Ready". (The RK11-C manual gave bit 7 as
"Drive Ready", and bit 6 as "Access Ready".)
> Bit 6 has a different name in the two descriptions but the meaning
> appears to be the same.
Yup.
Thanks for catching that for me!
Noel
Very nice book scanner!There is? probably?a? second? career?? ?out there? for? you if? you? chose to? make them!Ed#
In a message dated 1/1/2019 11:01:31 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, Guy Dunphy via cctalk wrote:
> This may be a good place to mention a text I began writing some while ago:
>
> On Scanning.
>? http://everist.org/temp/__On_scanning.htm
>
> Meant to be a 'how to' about scanning and post-processing techniques, written as I
> explored that myself. It's not finished because I was working on a solution to the
> 'screened images with overlaid sharp text' post-processing problem, when sidetracked.
> As often happens with me. Also that project diverged into the whole text encoding
> thing. Which I can't discuss, but I *can* discuss scanning issues.
>
> Anyway, any comments, corrections and suggestions for extra material are welcome.
>
Here's a video on a diy book scanner I built in order to scan all the
Crescent Software documentation I got.? Seems relevant to this. :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niwLAbgRpDE
(Crescent Software archive is here:
http://annex.retroarchive.org/crescent)
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby.? Geeks collect hobbies.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
> From: Al Kossow
> I do not archive any paper myself.
There are quite a few silver-dish lovers; you might be able to raise some
funds by listing stuff on eBait (although I can easily see that maybe it
would be more hassle than it's worth).
> Currently, I am being asked to reduce my backlog inside of Shustek and
> am making some hard choices.
Can you say anything about this (it sounds troubling)? Can we help in any
way? (And the "inside of Shustek" is puzzling - I thought Shustek was a
person?)
Noel
Hi all,
Some here may know I?ve been working on an 11/45 restoration off and on for some time now. My ?45 currently has floating point, KT11-C mem mgmt, 124 kword MS11-L, and an RK11-C with one restored RK05 drive.
Last week I decided to see if I could bring up RSTS/E on the machine. I managed to sysgen a minimal V06C system that can run off a single RK05 pack under simh, but when I transfer that image to the real hardware using pdp11gui it does not seem to completely/successfully boot.
The ?Option:? boot loader comes up and sub-commands there seem to be working (in particular, the ?HARDWARE? sub command shows correctly detected hardware and options). When booting RSTS/E, after supplying date and time, the idle pattern starts on the front panel (but just the bottom part, on the data lights). When console is in display register mode, it shows an increasing count. Console input is echo?d, but the INIT banner and subsequent prompts are never printed and the read light on the RK05 flickers continuously as if the system is trying to read the same sector over and over.
Figured I?d ping here in case this is a known failure mode to folks more familiar with RSTS/E? Also posted over on the vcfed DEC forum. FWIW, the machine is passing all MAINDEC CPU, MMU, FP, KW11, and RK11 diagnostics.
Cheers,
?-FritzM.
I used the libtiff-tools (Debian 8.x - 32 Bit) to extract all 61 .TIF's
>from the
Multipage .tif file. While the .tif's look descent, and RasterVect shows
the
.tif properties to be Group 4 Fax (1bpp) with 5100 x 6600 pixels - 300 DPI,
I can't get tesseract 3.x, TextBridge Classic 2.0, or Irfanview with KADMOS
Plugin to OCR any of the .tif files, with descent results. I'd expect an
OCR
of 85 to 90 % correct conversion to ASCII text.
Typically, one of the three above Software packages will do a descent job
of OCRing .tif's of such scans. (Most PDF's end up at 72 x 72 DPI, and
converting them to 300 DPI, allows them to be properly OCR'd.)
If anyone else has had better luck, I'd like to know what your process is.
Thanks.
Larry
Being the 50th anniversary of the flight of Apollo 8, I was watching a newly-uploaded informational film of the mission on Youtube:
https://youtu.be/83cGclY9OZk?t=1092
At 18:02 and 18:13 there are what appeasr to be small blue/green tabletop printers on trolleys positioned next to the consoles.
They don't have an I/O Selectric form factor but are more like a teletype, or something else entirely, in a sound-deadening box.
There's no platen knob visible and it doesn't look to be fanfold paper (I think) so I'm just curious as to any idea what they are?
Steve.
Resolution? of? photos seems? low? however.?? Was? this? a? set? made at an? earlier? time?
A? useful? reference? though as? most? ?would? never? be able? to collect up? a set? of these.
We? are? thankful? ?for? what? we? have .Ed# SMECC
In a message dated 12/31/2018 10:12:47 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On 12/31/18 5:20 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
> Are these currently online?
They are on bitsavers under afips for now
The intent/agreement when I gave IEEE my scans was they were to be hosted by CHM,
but that hasn't happened yet.
They are also the entire volume, IEEE distributes them by paper and left off the
front matter.
At 03:10 AM 31/12/2018 -0600, you wrote:
>I know of one outside of Chicago that is as is. I might be ab;e to move it
>a state or two or help out with the arrangements. I know nothing about
>it, but I can text or email 2 pics.
>
>Paul
User manual: https://www.manualslib.com/download/647954/Kip-2050.html
I know of one outside of Chicago that is as is. I might be ab;e to move it
a state or two or help out with the arrangements. I know nothing about
it, but I can text or email 2 pics.
Paul
Does anyone know the OFFICIAL status of RSTS/E source? I am aware of the
Mentec license, but it appears to only grant a license to the binary
distribution.
I believe I have source tapes to RSTS/E version 5 & 6 that I would like to
release copies, but I cannot until I can get official permission. I
acquired the tapes from a person who did some development on early PDP-11's.
I am checking my binary versions of the RSTS tapes and if they are ok, I
can release RSTS/E V5B and RSTS/E V6B.
--barrym
-----Original Message-----
>From: Liam Proven via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Dec 19, 2018 5:57 AM
>To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Re: More old stuff incoming
>
>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 22:42, Grant Taylor via cctalk
><cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think PS/2s range from 286 - (very few) Pentium. I don't /think/
>> there were any 8086 / 8088 PS/2s, but I could be mistaken.
>
>As "system_glitch" said, there were.
>
>The original model 30 was an 8086, and not even a great one -- it
>didn't have true VGA, for instance.
>
>http://ps-2.kev009.com/pcpartnerinfo/ctstips/7492.htm
>
>It was also available in a small-form-factor all-in-one case as the Model 25:
>
>http://www.ibmfiles.com/pages/ps2model25.htm
>
>http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?st=1&c=1183
>
>Easily mistaken for a PS/1. That got me a lot of abuse on Twitter recently.
>
>Then there was the Model 30-286, a sort of mucked-about PC-AT.
>
>http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/2585/IBM-PS-2-Model-30-286/
>
>And from our own Tezza:
>
>https://www.classic-computers.org.nz/collection/ps2-286-30.htm
>
>They're sort of not "real" PS/2s because they have the AT bus, not
>MicroChannel. I think the 30-286 could run OS/2 though.
>
>The same case (or very nearly) was reused for the Model 55SX. I
>actually have one of these.
>
>https://ancientelectronics.wordpress.com/2015/08/06/ibm-ps2-model-55sx/
>
>It's a "true" PS/2 with MCA. I hope to get an old version of OS/2 2 or
>3 going on mine some time.
>
>--
>Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
>Email: lproven at cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
>Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
>UK: +44 7939-087884 - ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
Tho ive seldom posted but have always read this list i cannot resist - somewhere stored away in my piles of stuff I have an IBM Model 30 I believe that has an 8 bit isa bus and an 80186 cpu.
- thanks - billp
Chuck,
I?ve found the Living Computers Museum in Seattle is interested in building their collection of paper copies of journals, and will pay for shipping. The form to offer items for donation is here: https://livingcomputers.org/Discover/Contribute-Historical-Artifacts.aspx . The more carefully you list the specific issues you have, the more likely they are to accept your offer (assuming they don?t already have the same issues). I?ve donated ACM publications and also various early PC magazines to them, plus a bunch of old MSDN CD-ROMs.
Paul
> From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com <mailto:cclist at sydex.com>>
>
> I wish I would have known. I joined IEEE Annals at the beginning. I
> eventually dropped my subscription because I found that the inaccuracies
> would just make me mad.
>
> I threw out a bunch of ACM SIGPLAN notices (the local library didn't
> want them) from the 1978s. Still need to get rid of a pile of old CACM
> rags as well as IEEE Computer. I'm staring at a pile of IEEE Micro and
> a bunch of PC-related magazines from the 80s-90s (e.g. "DOS Developer's
> Journal", which became "Windows/DOS Developer's Journal", which became
> "Windows Developer's Journal", which was then thankfully put out of its
> misery by merging into Doctor Dobbs').
>
> I still have a bunch of "PC Tech Journal" and other various periodicals.
>
> If anyone's looking for something special, let me know. They'll all be
> gone to the recycler by the end of January.
>
We? have? a? few? dupes here? but? reserving those? for? someone that might? ?help us? out.
Another? great? reference are the old? joint computer? conference? ?east and? west? ?books.? ?were or? became? AFIPS WOW THEY HAVE ALL? ? THE INSERTING? EARLY STUFF!
We? have the? stuff? from start to? the? 80s? ?as? I? remember... nothing newer..? ?a? fine? gift? ?from? Honeywell / Bull? HN and? ?some? from? side sources...? some of the later? hard? bound? ones? we? have? some? duplicates? of... need? to make a? list..? The? early? ones? ?we? may be? missing? an? issue ?? ?will? have to make a? current? list.
These AFIPS? ?publications are? ?another? group that? ?are not? in full open? access on the? internet? as? far as? I know..? But? ?should? be!
Some? I? like? looking at? ?for? something different? ?are the UK? data processing? Mags? form the? 50's and? 60s? as there are? computer and companies in there? I? know nothing about at all.
Ed#? ? SMECC
In a message dated 12/30/2018 1:43:42 PM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
Chuck,
I?ve found the Living Computers Museum in Seattle is interested in building their collection of paper copies of journals, and will pay for shipping. The form to offer items for donation is here: https://livingcomputers.org/Discover/Contribute-Historical-Artifacts.aspx . The more carefully you list the specific issues you have, the more likely they are to accept your offer (assuming they don?t already have the same issues). I?ve donated ACM publications and also various early PC magazines to them, plus a bunch of old MSDN CD-ROMs.
Paul
> From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com <mailto:cclist at sydex.com>>> > I wish I would have known.? I joined IEEE Annals at the beginning.? I> eventually dropped my subscription because I found that the inaccuracies> would just make me mad.> > I threw out a bunch of ACM SIGPLAN notices (the local library didn't> want them) from the 1978s.? Still need to get rid of a pile of old CACM> rags as well as IEEE Computer.? I'm staring at a pile of IEEE Micro and> a bunch of PC-related magazines from the 80s-90s (e.g. "DOS Developer's> Journal", which became "Windows/DOS Developer's Journal", which became> "Windows Developer's Journal", which was then thankfully put out of its> misery by merging into Doctor Dobbs').> > I still have a bunch of "PC Tech Journal" and other various periodicals.> > If anyone's looking for something special, let me know.? They'll all be> gone to the recycler by the end of January.>
Am just posting this as I am hoping someone out there knows someone who was
involved with Osborne back in the day to find out more this Osborne 1
motherboard I found in a low serial O1 I picked up for $100.
I reached out to Lee Felsenstein on it and he suggested it was related to
the boards produced for the 10 prototypes Osborne built, or a derivative of
them. He couldn't say for sure how it ended up in mine. But I was hoping
if anyone knows any Osborne experts that might help me on this - it is not
currently working and I'm hoping to find schematics, etc to get it going
again. Obviously with the radical differences in layout, the schematics for
the production motherboard isn't terribly helpful.
I've posted a blog about it here with a picture of the board for those
curious: http://bradhodge.ca/blog/?p=1186
Brad
RIGHT ON!
In a message dated 12/29/2018 5:35:20 PM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
The prime benefit of silverfish infested bulky piles of old paper, distributed widely among individuals who
value history, is that no central entity can just suddenly decide to destroy them all, for whatever reason.
Or 'mass edit' the digital files, like some corporations have been culling schematics from their archives of
digitized old manuals.
yep IEEE? lets none of thier? stuff into the open? that? is? sought? after...
Worse? yet... Lucent? gave them Bell System? Tech? Journals? which? Lucent? had? ? up? for? free... then? then? IEEE? slapped them? behind a? paywall.
Ed#
In a message dated 12/29/2018 1:00:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On 12/29/18 11:49 AM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> I just passed along three boxes of these to the VCFed collection.
> Eventually I assume there will be a library to make these available onsite,
> not sure.
Stupid question, but doesn't IEEE CS already have these archived?? (Yes,
I know for access, you need to cross their palm with silver, but it
might point to copyright issues).
--Chuck
Zane wrote:
> I didn?t realize they were 48-bit, though I seem to remember them being 24-bit.
> The system I used was more ?logistics? and general purpose ADP. I spent a *LOT*
> of time using the MUSE word processor.
>
> Zane
>> On Dec 28, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Bob Smith <bobsmithofd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I almost remembered, had to look it up to confirm 81, the 48bit system
>> they carried on when they bought the original company that had made
>> them and the Vulcan OS. Not a bad scientific and instrumentation
>> machine. What was the original company Datacraft or something?
>> bob
>>
Zane, you are right that the Harris computers were 24-bit processors.
The primary word was 24 bits, with double integer at 48 bits and full floating
point at 96 bits.
Someday, when I have time, maybe I will think about an emulator. But not
right now.
I too spent many hours on Harris systems from 1977 to about 1983 or 1984,
in college and then in working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during
summers and break weeks in graduate school. Most of my work was with
FORTRAN, plus some assembly and COBOL.
Kevin Anderson
Pdp 8 tapes...
I have a bid i for these. Was planning to duplicate - not for profit - and stick em up on a we-site for others to view/download.... Is there a repository for such tapes?? Bitsaver??
Sent from my HUAWEI P10 on Three
Peter, the second one in your list is an example of a 6X00 cordwood package.
--
Dave Mausner. +1-312-925-3694. +1-708-848-2775.
Rem tene; verba sequentur -- Cato
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 3:01 PM <
controlfreaks-request at lists.controlfreaks.org> wrote:
> Send Controlfreaks mailing list submissions to
> controlfreaks at lists.controlfreaks.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://lists.controlfreaks.org/listinfo.cgi/controlfreaks-controlfreaks.org
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> controlfreaks-request at lists.controlfreaks.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> controlfreaks-owner at lists.controlfreaks.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Controlfreaks digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Fwd: CDC transistor boards (Paul Koning)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net>
> To: controlfreaks <controlfreaks at controlfreaks.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:47:16 -0500
> Subject: Fwd: CDC transistor boards
> Seen on another list, I identified the second but not the other two.
>
> paul
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Peter Van Peborgh via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org>
> *Subject: **CDC transistor boards*
> *Date: *December 28, 2018 at 3:42:44 PM EST
> *To: *<cctech at classiccmp.org>
> *Reply-To: *Peter Van Peborgh <peter at vanpeborgh.eu>, "General Discussion:
> On-Topic Posts" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
> Gentlemen of advanced years who can remember CDC, cradle of Cray.
>
> Can you tell me which CDC computer type these three boards belonged to? It
> is for labeling purposes in my personal museum.
>
> https://postimg.cc/crJHv3Lt
> https://postimg.cc/Z0HnYH4h
> https://postimg.cc/6TtTNgs0
>
> I am sure this will be easy for the right person. Many thanks!
>
> peter
>
>
>
>
>
Gentlemen of advanced years who can remember CDC, cradle of Cray.
Can you tell me which CDC computer type these three boards belonged to? It
is for labeling purposes in my personal museum.
https://postimg.cc/crJHv3Lthttps://postimg.cc/Z0HnYH4hhttps://postimg.cc/6TtTNgs0
I am sure this will be easy for the right person. Many thanks!
peter
Finally I got hold of the sources for the PDP-11 SPACE WAR that was
submitted to DECUS by Bill Seiler.
The format is scans of the PAL-11S listing output. It is easy to crop the
image to only contain actual source. Then running OCR on it. Tried a few
online versions and tesseract.
The problem is that the paper that the listing is printed on has lines.
Very black lines. It makes the OCR go completely crazy. Source lines
without black lines OCR ok. The others do not. The files need massive
amount of manual intervention.
Does anyone have an idea how to process files like this?
A good way to remove the black lines?
There are only 19 source files with three or four pages each so I don't
think it makes sense to try to train tesseract to do it (training tesseract
seems to be a huge undertaking).
https://i.imgur.com/dvY973s.png
/Mattis
Hi friends,
I've been building up a nice little PDP-11/23+ with cabinets, RL02's etc. To really round things off, I'm looking for a open reel-to-reel style 9-track tape drive to add to the system (don't ask why, punishment must be somewhere in my nature). Not interested in the autoloading/drawer type drives.
There are some fujitsu drives on ebay at the moment, but shipping from CA to NY is both costly and risky.
Does anyone have a (preferably working) 9-track drive that can be used with a PDP-11 (like a pertec interface) for sale? Willing to drive anywhere from Philly to Boston for one.
Hopefully one in good shape.
Thanks
73 Eugene W2HX
> From: Allison
> IC as in digital logic were in production in the early 60s
Yes, but if you look at the picture/manual (I found a "Module location for
I/O" chart on pg. 335 of the PDP-7 Maint Manual - alas, not the whole
machine, just the FLIP CHIP part), the PDP-7 is all B-series and R-series
FLIP CHIPs, which are all discrete transistors.
AFAIK, the first ICs (in the modern sense) on FLIP CHIPS were on M-series.
Noel
does it have rca number and plate on back paul?
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
On Friday, December 28, 2018 Paul Anderson via cctalk <useddec at gmail.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
A few weeks ago Devon had a 555, which I've had years ago.? I have never
seen a 512 before, so I picked it up. Anyone here need one, or links to TEK
lists? Feel free to repost. AS is, where is, zip 61853.
Thanks, Paul
A few weeks ago Devon had a 555, which I've had years ago. I have never
seen a 512 before, so I picked it up. Anyone here need one, or links to TEK
lists? Feel free to repost. AS is, where is, zip 61853.
Thanks, Paul
Hi,
I do remember that when installing HP-UX 9 and earlier, you could not
mix and match SCSI and HP-IB. If you boot from HP-IB you can install
on HP-IB, if you boot from SCSI, you can install on a SCSI disk. That may
be a limitation in the installer. Once you have everything installed, you
can use any device. I am very sure that this was the case with the 800s.
I am not quite sure about the 300 series.
I once owned a 380 and it worked well with SCSI disks and the onboard
SCSI port.
regards,
Dennis
Hello Folks!
Here is another batch of goodies from the Warehouse:
Micropolis MicroDisk Maintenance Manual
Catalog of Public Domain Software for CP/M Book 1 & 2
Wabash 8" Floppy Disk 10-pack (shrinkwrapped)
Sony MD-2D 5.25" Floppy Diskette 10-pack (shrinkwrapped)
Kraft 3-button Mouse
PDP-11 BASIC-PLUS Language Manual
RL01/RL02 User Guide & Technical Manual
RL01/RL02 User Guide
RLV12 Disk Controller Configuration Sheet
RX02 Floppy Disk System User's Guide
DEC Microcomputer Products Group u[micro]note Reprints
PDP-11 Diagnostic Engineering Source Code Prints
DEC RoamAbout PCMCIA Network Adaptor
External 5.25" Drive
VisiCalc
Tektronix 119-1592-01 Terminal Keyboard
Bondwell B310SX laptop
TI Home Computer Applications Software Bundle (18 boxed titles)
Convergent Technologies WP-100 Microprinter
Convergent Technologies WC-100 Comm Port
Convergent Technologies Workslate Leader's Guide
Convergent Technologies Workslate Marketing Collateral
Convergent Technologies Accessory Bundle
Convergent Technologies Thermal Paper Roll
Accton EN2212-1 Ethernet PCMCIA Card
New Media Corp. PCMCIA Game Port Joystick Adapter
Rolodex REX Docking Station
Sharp CE-IR2 Wireless Interface
Apricorn external hard disk pack
ASP SX100 SNAP Parallel Transmitter
LeeMah Data Security Corp. InfoKey
HP Jornada Docking Station
HP F1869-60001 Pocket Camera for HP Jornada Pocket PC
HP C4103A FIR 4Mbps IrDA module
Sony CDW-900E Compact Disc Recording Unit
Sony WebTV INT-W200 Internet Terminal
Sony SM0-E301F 128MB Magneto Optical Disk Drive
SGI Iris Indigo XS
Radio Shack TRS-80 Printer Interface Cable
Tandy Printer Interface Selector 2
CTK Adam Acoustically Coupled Modem
Microsoft Mouse & Microsoft Paintbrush (boxed)
IDT Series 1050/1750 Operations and Maintenance Instructions
IDT Series 1050/1750 TDF 4050 Tape Formatter Operations Manual
Data Broadcasting Corp. Signal Cable Receiver Plus
Olympus Deltis 230MB Magneto Optical Disk Subsystem
Compaq Contura Aero 4/25
I've still got a sale going until the end of 2018: Take 10% off anything
with a listing date prior to 2018 (check the "Date Added" column in the
warehouse item listings--anything listed in 2016-2017 is 10% off!)
If you're a previous buyer (I know who you are) the 10% off applies to any
listed item!
For you DEC enthusiasts, I'd like to clear out the documentation, so from
now until the end of the year I'm giving 10% off any DEC documentation
(this would be in [B]addition[/B] to the 10% off special for you previous
buyers!)
The main index for newly listed items is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I53wxarLHlNmlPVf_HJ5oMKuab4zrApI_hi…
As always, please contact me directly by e-mail via <sellam.ismail at gmail.com>
to make an order or an offer.
Happy Holidays!
Sellam
I have one of these, but the system has HP-IB disk and tape. I'd like
to use a SCSI tape to install on it. On the CPU card, there is what
looks like a 50-pin connector. Does that need active electronics to
work like the second HP-IB bulkhead that currently occupies the slot?
Also does anyone have digital manuals for this particular model?
Regards,
Kevin
Hi,
Merry Xmas and Happy New Year (or Happy Holidays if that is your flavour),
Just to note to those interested in the Exidy Sorcerer. I've added 18 more
programs to the Sorcerer archive at
https://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/2017-01-23-software-for-real-sorc…
. To see what they are, check out the updates section at the bottom of the
page.
Most of the originals were provided by Al Kossow. Paul van der Spek
provided Military Encounter, Munch! and Sorcerer Invaders (thanks guys!)
Enjoy
Tez
Anyone have any HIPPI stuff, preferably for sale? The machine I have
uses the big parallel cables 100-pin but I guess there is a converter
to serial fiber.
Regards,
Kevin
Do any fellow cctalk / cctech subscribers have any experience with NFS,
particularly in combination with Kerberos authentication?
I'm messing with something that is making me think that Kerberos
authentication (sec=krb5{,i,p}) usurps no_root_squash.
Meaning that root can't access files owned by other users with go-rwx.
Almost as if no_root_squash wasn't configured on the export.
Does anyone have a spare bone that they would be willing to throw my way?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 12/26/18 11:41 AM, Craig Ruff wrote:
> I used Kerberos with NFS successfully at my last job. Any process/user
> id accessing NFS mounts using Kerberos authentication must have a valid
> Kerberos ticket, root included.
Okay. Thank you for confirming what I suspected but was still doubting.
I believe that root should have access as the system's keytab has
host/$FQDN and nfs/$FQDN principals. Root also has a ticket granting
ticket, krbtgt/$REALM. At least I think that means that root has vlaid
Kerberos tickets.
> The no_root_squash option is no longer relevant when Kerberos
> authentication is used, as you surmise.
ACK
> You can address this by getting a machine ticket that root can use.
That's my current working understanding. But, apparently I'm not
getting something correct. :-(
Thank you for the reply Craig.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Folks, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, thanks for all interesting
reading matter and let there be plenty of interesting stuff to read
about in a future, too.
:-)
--
Regards,
Tomasz Rola
--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... **
** **
** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_rola at bigfoot.com **
If you're into retro computing at all, and want to see how to hook old
computers up to new HDMI monitors, then check out @craig1black's new
video on doing exactly that.
Link - How to convert CGA video to HDMI for around $65
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpfrelhokKQ
I find this quite impressive and will likely have to look into this further.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Ok - not so much of a newbie - fed punch tape into a reader for a PDP8
when I attended tech school back when the earth was cooling ....
I have my hands on a PDP8a and a Remex reader. They both seem to
function OK with basic tests.
I would like to try to read a Mylar punch tape to see if there is
anything interesting on it - as well as a couple of paper tapes.
My end run would be to show something useful running on the PDP8a - and
loaded with the punch tape.
The Mylar reel would have been the programming for a CNC machine. I
suspect the first part of the reel may be some boot loader or init
routine.
So, my thought is this - connect the Remex unit to a Pi or Arduino to
capture the data and have a look at it or, load the tape directly into
the PDP8 and see what happens? Then, examine the PDP8 memory locations.
So, the issue is that I have not researched the proper way to get the
tape and PDP8 initialized and reading into the PDP8. I am not 100% sure
the Remex unit is working, other than it spins the reels.
Any suggestions??
Love the forum by the way - I wish I had a machine that would slow the
clock on the wall down to give me more time to play. I guess they call
that retirement .....
Cheers,
Brian
--
Brian McIntosh
Columbia Valley Maker Space Communications Guy
info at cvmakerspace.ca
250 270 0689
Does anybody here recognize the manufacturer of this gear,
presumably some kind of punched paper tape equipment?
Second to the last image at:
http://www.tapeheads.net/showthread.php?t=15284&highlight=movies&page=10
I recently had the chance to play with a Blu-Ray transfer of the old
gothic sci-fi TV show _The Outer Limits_ (the original 1963-64 series),
and some of the 50s magnetic tape equipment used as recurring props
can be identified -- e.g., an Ampex FR200 data recorder, Magnecord and Roberts
audio tape recorders, and even a pair of old Univac Uniservo I tape drives
in one episode.
But that twin paper-tape device (if that's what it is), which occurs
in the background of a number of first-season episodes, remains a
mystery. The lower reels (if there are any) seem to be out of sight
in the lower part of the cabinet in all shots of the device, and
there seems to be a continuous loop of paper tape threaded around
the tape guides and back up to the upper reel (which is actually
spinning in at least one episode).
Anybody know what this might be?
Hi,
the Epson HX-20 handheld computer offered an interesting way to connect
it with peripheral devices. The serial port at the back of the computer
can talk to external hardware using an Epson-specific protocol for data
exchange. As this protocol is quite well documented, I wrote a little
program called "flashx20" (for FLoppy And Screen for the HX-20), which
allows to connect a normal Windows PC or notebook computer to the HX-20,
where the PC interprets the Epson serial protocol and simulates an
external display controller and four external floppy disk drives (like
e.g. the Epson TF-20).
With that, you get a big screen (the PC monitor) and disk space for
programs and data on the PC's hard disk, which can then also be used for
data and program exchange.
You can read more about it and download the program from my website at
http://members.aon.at/nkehrer/
Norbert
wanted any and all XSCRIBE closed caption related and steno typer key board related ... docs... parts.. units building up an working analog CC demo chain for display in our Deaf and Hard of Hearing assisting tech area. will consider othe brand gear to if even just for static display too....
Interested in ad materials photos, war stories. etc etc
thanks. Ed Sharpe
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
> From: Al Kossow
> "Straight-8" seems to be a fairly modern name coming from collectors
My _guess_ is that that probably happened because there is no formal 'model'
for that first one (unlike the first -11, which got re-named the -11/20
BITD), and people recently picked that to disambiguate them from all the
other -8's.
But what I _don't_ know is _why_ that particular name? I was hoping some
-8 collector knew...
Noel