All is OK! Even the power supply is quiet now. I think it may have been
squealing only when the full load wasn't being drawn (I had both drives
disconnected) and only for a few seconds after power-up.
Anyway, the problem with the LCD panel was really nothing. The new
connector simply needed to mate with longer pins to make proper contact.
The pins at the back of the LCD panel were long enough, but the ones
inside the machine were not. I ground down the connector a little bit and
it works now.
I also fully disassembled the casing to get at the variable resistor that
controls the "contrast", because it was so dirty that I couldn't get a
stable picture at all. I used an aerosol contact cleaner on it.
I did find a loose paperclip during the disassembly. Hopefully it didn't
do any damage while it was in there.
The picture is now stable and clear. I used to get corrupted characters
and strange lines on the display at seemingly random times, but I used the
machine for at least six hours straight tonight and it never came back.
The screen also used to be sensitive to movement and its position, and now
it doesn't care if I grab it and flip it up while I'm using it. I'm
guessing that several other wires were in the process of working loose.
The screen is just naturally hard to read, but not nearly as hard as it
was. The contrast has to be adjusted according to the user's viewpoint,
and it's not always possible to clearly see the whole screen at once
(especially up close).
At some contrast settings, dark patches appear on the screen. Also, areas
of the screen react to what is being displayed on other areas with a kind
of ghosting, which can be a little distracting when the contents of the
screen are busy. I'm guessing that this is normal for this technology.
One really cool thing is that the characters appear to "float" on the
screen.
I think I can confirm a 1988 date for both construction and purchase.
Most of the parts with identifiable date stamps that I looked at had date
stamps of late '87 or the first few weeks of '88. Also, the contents of
the hard drive which I never inspected very thoroughly (because of the
screen) included personal and business (including many local businesses
that I know) tax records from 1987 through to 1991.
And yes, I did delete files of that nature as I found them. There were
approximately 16MB worth of accounting files, and only software that would
be useful in accounting, so clearly this was an accountant's machine.
I'm a bit disturbed by the implications of finding such information at a
garage sale.
There is something strange about the display, BTW. It has
externally-accessible dip switches. Four of them. And there's a note
taped inside the panel that certain pieces of software require a certain
switch setting.
I attempted to install GeoWorks 1.00 and found that its installation
program is one of the programs that needs that switch setting. :/
And no, I didn't get GeoWorks running, because I don't have a
PC-compatible mouse. :/ (I picked up GeoWorks at the Goodwill this week.)
Anyway, I'm still up because I've been watching the news all night.
<shudder> Had it not been for that, I probably would have reported back
with my success a lot sooner.
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>> In terms of copyright there is no thing like
>> 'lost ownership' Copyright (and other intelectual
>> property) is always originated by natural persons,
>> And if any kind of licencee (company, temopral owner)
>> is closed and no legal successor is available the rights
>> return to the original Author/Inventor.
> What happens if the author/inventor dies?
It comes to inheritance.
In fact, even copyright vanishes, but not before at least
50 Years.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
>>>if an author is proud of his book, he won't trash the manuscripts.
>>Such grave pronouncements. You might as well argue that they
>>shouldn't throw away their drafts. Fact is, they do. Once the
>>book is in print, they've got a real copy. What compelling
>>reason did he have to save the old floppy version? It's not
>>as if he thought there was any demand for a second edition.
>>Computer books come and go in six weeks these days.
> These days, but I think 1983 is a little different. And if a book is
> successfull, why wouldn't they think about a second edition. The
> compelling reason to save a floppy version is that they might want
> to go back and edit something.
First, not everybody is collecting everything :)
Second, for a sequent edition you will use the
medias from the publisher, or jur write the
changes in one copy and give it to the publisher
(And if you're very successful, you just tell him
via phone wat to change :).
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Dave Hick's fantastic HP calculator museum has an interesting page and
images of design studies and prototypes of a few HP desktop calculators
which illustrate how realistic some prototyping methods can be.
http://www.teleport.com/~dgh/designs/designs.htm
>
>As for computer cases, early models were probably handmade; it's not that
>hard. Take a run to your local Tap Plastics store. You can pick up all
>kinds/sizes of plastics that can then be made into just about anything.
>Also, model car/plane/boat shops probably have stuff to let you work with
>plastics.
>
>Even metal cases aren't that hard; I have a friend who built, as one of his
>first projects, an amazing set of cabinets/shelves for his Land Rover out
>of aluminum. Some simple tools are required, but nothing earth-shattering.
>
>I was talking to someone recently (Rax?) about building a custom
>wood-glass-and-brass case for a computer. Not that hard to build your
>first one in a plywood case, then worry about the production cases once
>you've got financing. (Of course, just make sure that cable going to the
>vax behind the curtain doesn't show! 8^)
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
>
>Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
>roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
>Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
>San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>
>
>
At 02:31 PM 8/26/98 PDT, you wrote:
>Curious. Same goes for people who aren't in a large company and
>invent various other things. How did he 'invent' a gun without
>owning the necessary tools (at least I doubt a magazine writer would
>own this stuff) to process metal? Also, how did Woz make a case for
>the Apple ][, etc? Are there companies that take single orders
>like this?
Well, reloading is a popular sport -- you take used cartridges, cast your
own bullets (heat metal, pour into molds), and combine them with as much
gunpowder as you like. Modifying the casing wouldn't be too hard, I
imagine for anyone with any basic metalworking skills, nor would altering
the bullet mold.
As for computer cases, early models were probably handmade; it's not that
hard. Take a run to your local Tap Plastics store. You can pick up all
kinds/sizes of plastics that can then be made into just about anything.
Also, model car/plane/boat shops probably have stuff to let you work with
plastics.
Even metal cases aren't that hard; I have a friend who built, as one of his
first projects, an amazing set of cabinets/shelves for his Land Rover out
of aluminum. Some simple tools are required, but nothing earth-shattering.
I was talking to someone recently (Rax?) about building a custom
wood-glass-and-brass case for a computer. Not that hard to build your
first one in a plywood case, then worry about the production cases once
you've got financing. (Of course, just make sure that cable going to the
vax behind the curtain doesn't show! 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
So what is it? Any model number on the machine?
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
-----Original Message-----
From: Max Eskin <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: TI Compact Computer 40
>
>
>
>
>I said it was _like_ a model 100, not an actual 100. It's very
>different, but the idea is similar.
I remember some laptop that had a special key combination to switch from LCD
to external monitor. You could not have both at the same time. Look for
extra feature keys (usually accessed by pressing a special FN key).
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Rutledge <ecloud(a)goodnet.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: LCD woes
>> Anyway, the machine has a special card in it for driving the LCD panel.
>> It is labeled "LCD & HGC CARD". What is "HGC"? It has an external 9-pin
>
>Probably "Hercules Graphics Card" - Hercules made the original
>mono graphics card that was cloned a lot and most cards for driving
>mono monitors are that variety. It gives you 720 x 4?? dots
>with each pixel being on or off. As well as being compatible
>with the original IBM PC mono video card (which had only text mode).
>It does use a 9-pin connector.
>
>> port on it and I tried plugging the monochrome display into it, but the
>> picture was all distorted so I figured it was using a different frequency
>> or something. The cursor comes out about an inch wide, and none of the
>> craracters are recognizable, possibly just from overwritten numerous
times
>> in the same scanline.
>
>Hmmm are you sure the monitor is OK?
>>
>> Oh, and BTW, I electrocuted myself last night when I touched some exposed
>> wiring going to the LCD panel. It surprised me that there was that much
>
>Is it backlit? Fluorescent backlights use relatively high voltage.
>
>--
> _______ KB7PWD @ KC7Y.AZ.US.NOAM
ecloud(a)goodnet.com
> (_ | |_) Shawn T. Rutledge on the web:
http://www.goodnet.com/~ecloud
> __) | |
\__________________________________________________________________
>* X window * virtual reality * knowledge base * ham radio * electronics *
>
I see another rocket has blown up.
Looks like it's time to break out those
desk top analog computers that got us
into space the first time.
=========================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com
Curator
Museum of Personal Computing Machinery
Sunnyvale,CA
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/museum
"This instrument can teach, it can illuminate;
Yes,and it can even inspire. But it can do so
only to the extent that humans are determined
to use it to those ends. Otherwise it is
merely lights and wires in a box."
- Micro68 computer User's Manual,EPA Inc. 1976
=========================================
FREE (yup, just shipping is all) to a good home....temrinals! One, two
or all.
1 - DEC model VT100, no keyboard but great shape and working. About
32 lbs shipping weight
2 - Visual model 102 complete with keyboard, great shape and
working. About 35 lbs shipping
3 - Texas Instruments model 911VDT, no keyboard. Great shape and
working. About 28 lbs shipping
NOTE....They go to that terrible place that many other unwanted
machines go soon - the DUMPSTER OF
DEATH if I don't get a firm response before long. I've held back
>from dumping them as I know someone out
there has a use for one or all of them. Shipping will be calculated
by USPS parcel post rates from me in zip 40144
to you and prepayment by money order or cashier's check is
required. I will ship the same or next day as I
recieve payment. If you want any of these contact me by direct
email SOON.
___________________________________________________
Russ Blakeman
Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
___________________________________________________
>> In terms of copyright there is no thing like
>> 'lost ownership' Copyright (and other intelectual
>> property) is always originated by natural persons,
>> And if any kind of licencee (company, temopral owner)
>> is closed and no legal successor is available the rights
>> return to the original Author/Inventor.
>
>What happens if the author/inventor dies?
I just went through a huge ordeal similiar to this in trying to get
Resnova's NovaServer (BBS server) put into the public domain.
The following, of course, does not constitute legal advice. ;-)
To quote Peter E. Converse:
---Start Quote---
When you say that ResNova "no longer exists in any way shape or form",
that
may mean several different things. It may mean that ResNova has gone
through a Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation, that its corporate charter has
been allowed to lapse, or merely that its operations have been abandoned.
Each of these possibilities leads to several different outcomes.
First, if ResNova is bankrupt, any intellectual property (like NovaServer)
would pass temporarily through the hands of a bankruptcy trustee, receiver
or debtor-in-possession. Then, this person probably would have attempted
to sell this intellectual property to satisfy the debts of the company.
If
ResNova is still going through a bankruptcy, you could contact the trustee
or receiver by checking federal Bankruptcy records.
Second, if ResNova's corporate charter has been allowed to lapse (which is
what I think you mean, if I had to bet), that corporation still owns the
intellectual property in question, even though it no longer exists under
the laws of the state of incorporation (subject to my comments about
abandonment below). You might be able to arrange to purchase or license
the IP by contacting the officers of the company. To find out who they
are, you could contact the Secretary of State of the state in which
Resnova
was originally incorporated. This would probably be the State of its
primary operations, or, alternatively, Delaware, NY or Calif. Any
Secretary of State will tell you, over the phone, the name of the
registered agent (prob an attorney or officer of the company) who could
help you arrange a purchase or license.
Third, if ResNova's shareholders, officers, directors and creditors have
all disappeared, you might be able to treat this intellectual property as
having been "abandoned." Unfortunately, if you do so, you may be
subjecting yourself to legal liability for unlicensed use of the IP in the
event that any of these folks turn up later. The burden in court would be
placed on you to prove that you made a rigorous effort to find the owners
and that they really had abandoned the asset. I would suggest making
thorough investigations as described in the above two paragraphs before
simply assuming that the asset has been abandoned.
Of course, you should understand that this information is merely general
and is not legal advice rendered as to specific facts. You should
probably
consult an attorney before taking any actions in this matter.
Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. I represent a number
of
software developers, consultants, consumer product marketers and IT
professionals.
Good Luck.
Peter E. Converse
The Law Offices of Peter E. Converse
8 South Michigan Avenue
Suite 2600
Chicago, Illinois 60603
(312) 214-0661
(312) 332-0600 Fax
convers(a)interaccess.com
---End Quote---
--
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
For anyone who was wondering, those RAM chips I was offering for free found a
home in a computer at the Red Cross courtesy of Russ. Thanks. Beats the heck
out of throwing them out. :)
--
Jim Strickland
jim(a)calico.litterbox.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
At 07:29 PM 8/25/98 -0700, you wrote:
>You bet I was there...what an incredible time! It was a
>fantastic event and well worth enduring the 110? heat!
Cool! Next Saturday our local Atari club meeting will be centered around
stories from the folks that went.
>Don Thomas has posted an excellent account
Saw that and a couple of others; it did sound like fun!
>I myself will be posting pictures as soon as they are scanned...
Excellent! Let us know when they're up!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>>> (Caveat: until someone comes forward to claim legitimate ownership.)
>> Jup, but acording to your ridiculous justice this means
>> bancrupcy for the next 3 generation to anyon of 'Us'.
> Not necessarily. I think some of this old technology could arguably be
> considered in the public domain, with companies having folded, owners
> having died, etc. Case in point: the IMSAI 8080. I think whatever
> vestiges of ownership of the IMSAI 8080 have been lost to time after the
> transformation into ComputerLand, the subsequent bankruptcy and then the
> re-birth of ComputerLand as Vanguard. This is what I gather after having
> read the book _Once Upon a Time in Computerland_.
In terms of copyright there is no thing like
'lost ownership' Copyright (and other intelectual
property) is always originated by natural persons,
And if any kind of licencee (company, temopral owner)
is closed and no legal successor is available the rights
return to the original Author/Inventor.
> Also, who owns the rights to the Altair 8800 now? Percom? ICOM? Ed
> Roberts? WHat happened after all the buyouts and bakruptcies?
Don't know, but they are not free.
Sad but true.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
These days, but I think 1983 is a little different. And if a book is
successfull, why wouldn't they think about a second edition. The
compelling reason to save a floppy version is that they might want
to go back and edit something.
>>if an author is proud of his book, he won't trash the manuscripts.
>
>Such grave pronouncements. You might as well argue that they
>shouldn't throw away their drafts. Fact is, they do. Once the
>book is in print, they've got a real copy. What compelling
>reason did he have to save the old floppy version? It's not
>as if he thought there was any demand for a second edition.
>Computer books come and go in six weeks these days.
>
>- John
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I said it was _like_ a model 100, not an actual 100. It's very
different, but the idea is similar.
>Yes the RS-232 is fully complient.. I use mine all the time..
>Goto www.TRS-80.com you will find out all you need there..
>Even a Model 100 user's club on the internet..
>
>Phil...
>
>Max Eskin wrote:
>>
>> I was just given one. It's a little Tand Model 100-like thing, it
>> came with a user's guide and some kind of book for learning BASIC.
>> Unfortunately, the manual is rather selective. Could someone tell me
>> if I can use the serial port on the back for RS-232 communications,
>> and what are the pin equivalents? If not, is there any kind of
>> modification that could be made? Also, does anyone have any software
>> cartridges for it they would be willing to send me? What is assembly
>> like for this processor? Does anyone have any comments about it?
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
if an author is proud of his book, he won't trash the manuscripts.
>
>On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, John Foust wrote:
>
>> who've since tossed their floppies with the original manuscript.
>> Without this, we're back to scanning and OCR and proofreading.
>> They'd thought that absolutely no one was interested. For example,
>> Sheldon Leemon, author of "Mapping the C-64", tossed his old Atari
>> floppies that had held his manuscript.
>
>This is something I hadn't considered. The authors of some of the most
>classic of computer books (I could name a bunch of Apple ones, like
>_Benath Apple DOS_ for one) should be contacted and asked to hold onto
>their original manuscripts if they still have them. While it wouldn't
be
>a total loss if they are thrown out, since at least the book survives
in
>thousands of coipies, it would be nice to have the original manuscript
>around in digital form to be preserved for millenia.
>
>I wonder if this is something we could turn into a concerted effort, a
>drive to root out old computer book authors, or if anyone is really
>interested.
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 08/25/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
HGC _could_ stand for Hercules Graphics Controller. I don't know.
The display... are you sure you haven't shorted anything with solder?
Have you tried using a VOM in O mode to directly stimulate the display?
Touching it to various pins should get various lines to appear.
>'fixing' my portable '286 box with LCD display (which I think is
_barely_
>classic).
>
>The cable leading to the display had had three of its wires pulled out,
>and I figured that this was the reason for the very weak and grungy
>display.
>
>I managed to solder little bits of wire into the holes and solder the
>stray wires from the cable onto those, but then I realized that I
couldn't
>plug the thing in anymore as the holes (from the underside) had filled
>with solder. :/
>
>And I also realized that my solution was a bad one because the
protruding
>wires would short against the metal frame that holds the LCD panel in
>place.
>
>So I used the connector from the C64 keyboard instead.
>
>Anyway, I got the cable rebuilt. I've tested it with the multimeter
and
>all the wires make contact and go to the right places.
>
>But now I can't get any kind of display from the LCD panel. It doesn't
>light up at all. It looks like it's totally dead.
>
>I put a monochrome display adapter card in the machine, and it will
boot
>up with that and display fine on a monochrome monitor. So the machine
is
>_mostly_ OK.
>
>I'm not sure the power supply is OK, though. It squeals now.
>
>So basically, I've turned an ill-looking display into a dead display,
and
>for some reason a healthy power supply is now sounding sick.
>
>Bleah!
>
>Anyway, the machine has a special card in it for driving the LCD panel.
>It is labeled "LCD & HGC CARD". What is "HGC"? It has an external
9-pin
>port on it and I tried plugging the monochrome display into it, but the
>picture was all distorted so I figured it was using a different
frequency
>or something. The cursor comes out about an inch wide, and none of the
>craracters are recognizable, possibly just from overwritten numerous
times
>in the same scanline.
>
>I don't know where I'll go from here. I'm just taking a breather
>before continuing. I wanted to be rebuilding the TS1016 RAM pack by
now
>instead of still messing with this damn PC. <s>
>
>Oh, and BTW, I electrocuted myself last night when I touched some
exposed
>wiring going to the LCD panel. It surprised me that there was that
much
>juice going through there. My thumb and forefinger are still tender.
But
>the display was still working at that point, and looking much sharper
than
>it had been. But the machine wouldn't close up properly because the
>connector was too thick and that's why I went back in today, just to
>reverse the cable so that the big fat Commodore connector was on the
>inside instead of on the LCD panel end. (Which meant pulling the
connector
>apart and rebuilding it the other way, just so it would fit in.)
>
>I haven't crossed any wires, I haven't plugged anything in backwards,
and
>I haven't dropped anything into the machine, so I don't know what I've
>done wrong.
>
><s>
>
>
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>Also, who owns the rights to the Altair 8800 now? Percom? ICOM? Ed
>Roberts? WHat happened after all the buyouts and bakruptcies?
Which rights? The name? The design? The PC board layouts? The
documentation?
I would think the only things left to worry about are the name and
any copyrights that might exist on the PC artwork. I doubt the
actual design is protected at all - it's almost exactly what you'd get
if you just took one of the Intel 8080A databooks and copied the CPU
implementation. Why would anybody want to
make an exact clone of the original design anyway? A couple
months after the introduction of the Altair there were hundreds
of garage-based businesses selling much better designed S-100
CPU's and peripherals!
-----
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology Voice: 301-767-5917
7328 Bradley Blvd Fax: 301-767-5927
Bethesda, MD, USA 2081
I also have a TI-74, with all of the rom cartridges, and the
PC interface... I have not yet bought the printer for it...
If you use AltaVista search for "TI-74", you should get the TI
web site, which will point you to another site, which is where
I actually purchased the stuff from. I also got some manuals on
the TI-74... they have RAM cartridges, ROM cartridges, the
printer, the TI->PC interface (and software) and some other
stuff as well. They also have stuff for the TI-95 (ProCalc)
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>>>Us.
>>>(Caveat: until someone comes forward to claim legitimate ownership.)
> There are one possible way, but it isn't very safe - see below.
Addendum: I'm not a lawyer - just some publishing knowledge.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
>>Us.
>>(Caveat: until someone comes forward to claim legitimate ownership.)
> I wonder if there is legal precedent that might establish a reasonable
> level of due diligence to determine that a copyright asset has indeed
> been abandoned, and a legitimate method by which someone else could
> be considered at least allowed to reproduce it but perhaps not claim
> ownership of it. In short, a process to follow that would establish
> that something is on its way to becoming public domain. Without
> preservation now, the asset might be truly lost.
There are one possible way, but it isn't very safe - see below.
> For example, I've contacted several authors of early computer books
> who've since tossed their floppies with the original manuscript.
> Without this, we're back to scanning and OCR and proofreading.
> They'd thought that absolutely no one was interested. For example,
> Sheldon Leemon, author of "Mapping the C-64", tossed his old Atari
> floppies that had held his manuscript.
Just loosing _one_ media doesn't mean loosing copyright.
If one wants to get rid of his rights, he has to proclam
this in a prominent and usefull manner - like anouncing
it in a state publication or any kind of aprobiate publication.
Like puting an anouncement in a sourcefile.
It's exactly the reverse way as claiming an title for a book
or movie - If you want to avoide that someone else will
use a title of a planned book, you have to anounce it in a
aprobiate manner - i.e. in Germay you till put an add in the
'Boersenblatt des Deutschen Buchhandels' - a 'news'paper
for publishing companies and book traders.
For this case (reprinting a book), there are two and a half
steps to perform:
First try to get knowledge of the holder of rights. Basicly
easy, since book rights are always originated by the author.
Find the author, and ask if there are current licences. Apply
for a licence. If he has no futher interest, he may offer it
exclusive and unlimited for just a beer or two. Try to get a
written statement.
Geting licence doesn't include source material like disks
or scripts - if they are lost, you still have to key in
every letter again ...
Second if you can't locate the author, or any other people
possible owning actual licences or able to legitimate their
rights, you are free to copy and redistribute the work.
The hard term is 'unable to locate the owner' - judges
(at least in Europe and especialy the US) put up very
high bars to cross. You have to show that you did anything
possible (Adds, writing to former publishers, companies,
familie, friends, etc. searching directories).
Now you can start to reproduce the book - BUT in your best
interest you should take step twoandahalf: Opening a closed
account (I don't know the exact US term - its an account
where yo ujust put in money, but never take it back - possibly
managed by a lawyer) for the author/owner of rights. Now
'just' pay the royalities into this account.
If a beliveable owner of rights shows up, you just have to
grant him access to this account. A possible 'new' royality
agreement has to be made at this point. If the owner of
rights disagrees with the summ (you have to open your books
for double check sales and business regarding this licence)
don't grant the access and wait for his court move.
As long as your amount of saved royalities is reasonable
any court decision inf favour or the owner wouldn't grant
more, so be aware and don't put the royalities to low,
becaus if the judge thinks so, the summs can be enormous -
at leat within the strange US system.
This method (step twoandahalf) can (and will) be used on
any matter regarding intelectual properies - books, music
('legal' bootlegs use this to avoid geting dumped in the US)
or patents (If company A won't give company B a licence, B
could try it via twoandahalf - as long as they are able
without support from A :)
The trick is that you are NOT stealing the property - you
are willing to pay, but some strange thing might hinder you.
(This is even at wartime true, which leads to the very strange
fact where Germany took a way more civilizated position than
the US - Germany payed royalities even during the war for
tecnologie used - including weapon tecnologie - while the
US just declared any German patent or Trademark non existent.
Some things can caus dizziness when thinking about)
Ok, back to our book project: If you get the permission
>from the author (like Sheldon Leemon) you're fine - don't
forgett to ask if theres still a licence, maybe even a
exclusive one for a publishing company, since in this
case you still have to look for the (original) publisher.
But regarding the KIM, with his chaotic past, a simple
solution isn't available.
Gruss
H.
Oh, and don't forgett: Even a non profit copying action
is forbidden. so if a C= group, for example, make copies
of the C64 ROM to distrimute within their group and friends
FOR FREE, they are subject to pay royalieties.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
I decided to run a number of different tapes to try to determine whether
my TK50Z drive was defective or the tapes were not bootable. Below are
the results of the tests. Since in each case the results are somewhat
different, I conclude that the drive reads OK, and that the tapes are
suspect. Does anyone have a different perspective?
- don
=======================
ULTRIX APPLICATION TAPE
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> b mu
-MUA0
%VMB-F-SCBINT2, PC = 00007000, PSL = 041F0008
83 BOOT SYS
-DUA0
-MUA0
%VMB-F-SCBINT2, PC = 00007000, PSL = 041F0008
83 BOOT SYS
?02 EXT HLT **** Infinite loop without the halt ****
PC = 00002704
>>>
>>>
>>> VMS APP TAPE
^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> b mu
-MUA0
%VMB-F-ERR, PC = 00000765
%VMB-I-STS, R0 = 000008C2
84 FAIL
>>>
>>>
>>> DEGAUSSED TAPE
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-MUA0
%VMB-F-ERR, PC = 00000765
%VMB-I-STS, R0 = 000001F6
84 FAIL
>>>
>>>
>>> VMS 5.5 BIN TAPE
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> b mu
-MUA0
%VMB-F-ERR, PC = 00000765
%VMB-I-STS, R0 = 000008C2
84 FAIL
>>>
Thats all folks!
I was just given one. It's a little Tand Model 100-like thing, it
came with a user's guide and some kind of book for learning BASIC.
Unfortunately, the manual is rather selective. Could someone tell me
if I can use the serial port on the back for RS-232 communications,
and what are the pin equivalents? If not, is there any kind of
modification that could be made? Also, does anyone have any software
cartridges for it they would be willing to send me? What is assembly
like for this processor? Does anyone have any comments about it?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
The last step before I cart my Tek to Santa Clara for the VCF:
Insurance.
Insurance companies don't like things without a replacement value. I
have asked around how much to insure it for, and Dr Dooijes (curator of
the Computer Museum in Amsterdam) has suggested $3000.
Anyone else have any ideas:
Are there any other 4052s around?
What might be the market rate?
Whom else can I ask?
Also, anyone have any suggestions about how to pack it for the flight?
Large box with lots of foam seems to be the best idea so far. Unless I
can get hold of a Tek carrying case...
Philip.
At 02:22 AM 9/2/98 -0700, Sam wrote:
>
>Us.
>(Caveat: until someone comes forward to claim legitimate ownership.)
I wonder if there is legal precedent that might establish a reasonable
level of due diligence to determine that a copyright asset has indeed
been abandoned, and a legitimate method by which someone else could
be considered at least allowed to reproduce it but perhaps not claim
ownership of it. In short, a process to follow that would establish
that something is on its way to becoming public domain. Without
preservation now, the asset might be truly lost.
For example, I've contacted several authors of early computer books
who've since tossed their floppies with the original manuscript.
Without this, we're back to scanning and OCR and proofreading.
They'd thought that absolutely no one was interested. For example,
Sheldon Leemon, author of "Mapping the C-64", tossed his old Atari
floppies that had held his manuscript.
- John
>> I think this is a formidable example for all our old (pre 1980)
>> toys - Almost all of the small (and even some of the big)
>> manufactiurers/designers have vanished. So who owns the design,
>> the ROM code, the spechial chip designs, the manuals and any
>> other soft ?
> Us.
*g*
Toys R Us !
> (Caveat: until someone comes forward to claim legitimate ownership.)
Jup, but acording to your ridiculous justice this means
bancrupcy for the next 3 generation to anyon of 'Us'.
Still searching
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> I thought I was the only one who owned a TI-74. I'm looking for the
> specs too. TI does mention some authorized service centers on their web
> page for the TI-74. I haven't got a chance to contact any of them for
> information.
I have one, and 4 spare printers (fleamarket haul).
> Check out: http://www.ti.com/calc/docs/7495.htm
Marysville, WA is kind of down under from Muenchen, Bavaria :)
> ----------------------------
> Zu denken ist gut, dass Sie sind gut
:))
Knapp daneben ist auch vorbei.
Altavista or German lessons ?
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Today I saved from the mythical Company Dumpster the following Stuff:
DEC uVAX II/RC in 4' cab with Cipher Digital horiz. 9trk drive.
Printronix P 300 Line Printer (from long-gone Prime Mainframe)
Hewlett Packard :
(2) 7914 disk drive units, one damaged in fall.
An HP Systems cab with (1) 9144 and (2) 3000.
(1) 2563A LIne Printer. (Very nice condition)
Heads Up part: I do not particularly want the HP stuff, I took it
to be nice to the warehouse foreman (to whom it's just junk he has to
move around).
SoCal area HP collectors.... any Interest??? Anyone? I have more
than my share of non-DEC orpans now... heeellpppp....
WANTS: Unibus 9trk formatter card for Kennedy 9300, or preferably
a TE16 and cards in SoCal or thereabouts. Need vacuum column door
for abovementione Kennedy... or a whole 'nother drive... I'm not picky.
MINC stuff. FSW Votrax (commercial Version) for PDP-11.
An 11/750 w/magtape.... ?
Cheers
John
John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com> wrote:
> (2) 7914 disk drive units, one damaged in fall.
I'm thinking these are largish floor-standing units (about half
washing-machine size) good for about 120MB. They could have cartridge
tape drives in them too, do they?
> An HP Systems cab with (1) 9144 and (2) 3000.
9144 is an HP cartridge tape drive.
A 3000 in that sort of cabinet is probably a Series 37 or Micro 3000,
a little departmental system good for about eight terminals. Should
have a key for the front panel and I hope it's there because
fabricating it could be a problem (it is a small metal strip with
indentations drilled in but not through its larger faces).
> (1) 2563A LIne Printer. (Very nice condition)
300LPM printer, could be serial or HP-IB or maybe parallel (with a
50-pin telco connector) though I only remember the parallel on its
bigger faster cousins. If serial, it would be usable with other
things; I think it speaks something like PCL but certainly not the PCL
of the many-DPI printers. Used to use one as a remote serial printer
hung off a 3000 and it was very reliable.
> SoCal area HP collectors.... any Interest??? Anyone? I have more
> than my share of non-DEC orpans now... heeellpppp....
I'm not quite SoCal (a little bit north of San Jose) and won't be able
to make it down there for a little while. Plus IDDD (I Don't Do DEC)
and so don't have any of the stuff you're interested in for a swap.
Also I have two 3000/37s of my own. So I won't be hurt if someone
else gets 'em, in fact that's part of the reason I am writing this
message, to help other folks down there figure out what this stuff is.
-Frank McConnell
Looks like a good bunch of DEC freebies (at least to non-profit folks)
available in Santa Fe, NM (at least if the Santa Fe Institute moniker is
any indication). Please contact this fellow directly if interested.
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
From:
"Phillip Williams" <phdevaxvms(a)roadrunner.com>
Newsgroups:
comp.sys.dec
Subject:
its that time again
Date:
2 Sep 1998 05:04:51 GMT
Organization:
Santa Fe Institute
Lines:
20
Message-ID:
<01bdd62d$f7f45820$df733bc6@pilar>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
dial531.roadrunner.com
X-Trace:
santaclara.santafe.edu 904712691 23951 209.12.73.131 (2
Sep 1998 05:04:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
abuse(a)santafe.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:
2 Sep 1998 05:04:51 GMT
X-Newsreader:
Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161
Path:
blushng.jps.net!news.eli.net!news.fiber.net!news-stk-2.sprintlink.net!news-west.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!208.128.37.8!feeder.lobo.net!feeder.swcp.com!fugu!SantaFe!not-for-mail
well its time to go thru and sell or trade some stuff
RA92 qty 4
LN03Rs qty 2
DECstations 5000 qty 2
VT1300 qty 2
VT240 with modem (wow 1200 bps) qty 2
RX33 qty 4
BA200 with 16 megs KA650, QDSS, KDA50,CXA16,TK70, 2 RA70s with
OpenVMS 5.5-2 DECwindows/DECwrite/C/BASIC/FORTRAN/KERMIT
Once again if you are a none profit org and can arrange for pickup its
free and if you are a Homeless vet center then I'll pick up the price!!!
phillip
AfterMidNight BBS
56k connection with v90 with 30 megs of disk space and free web pages
IF YOU KNOW OF ANY VET THATS HOMELESS OR JUST DOWN AND
OUT WE OFFER FREE RESUME AND INTERNET ACCESS.
> <<
> Roger Lamson <rlamson(a)snds.com>
> San Diego, CA USA - Tuesday, September 01, 1998 at 12:39:56
> We have some old 1802 source code that was not documented,
> now we need to "reverse" engineer this code and develop
> flow charts so that we can then implement the correct algoithms
> in a new processor.
> Is there a cosmac 1802 users group out there?
> Is there a development system, UT20 from RCA out there?
> Thanks
> >>
> I'd offer this guy my COSMAC ICE, but currently I have no way to verify
> that it works (i.e., I haven't built my COSMAC ELF yet :-)
In fact, I still have a group of RCA tapes with an cross
assembler and other tools (for /360 compatible RCA Mainframe :)
- We just need one of these 1966..75 build dinosaurs.
Or to be more constructive, I'm still able to read and write
1802 Assm (or at least I belive to be - it's some years ago :).
Writing 'modern' Assemblers (Z80, x86, MIPS, ARM etc.) isn't
tragic at all.
I'm just a bit far away from SD.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
I have just had laid on me a very nice condition (from a bank) texas
Instruments model 911 VDT video display unit. I only have the screen
unit, no keyboard. It has two jacks on back, one marked keyboard and one
marked controller (9 pin male d-sub)
FREE to anyone that wants it, you pay the shipping of about 30 lbs. I
need to hear from people soon on it or it will go dumpster diving and
not come up for air. As it is I still have the Visual 102 (complete) and
DEC VT100 (no keyboard) to GIVE AWAY and the last inquiring mind never
got back with me. These are also in great condition and working order
and available for the cost of shipping.
___________________________________________________
Russ Blakeman
Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
___________________________________________________
I thought I was the only one who owned a TI-74. I'm looking for the
specs too. TI does mention some authorized service centers on their web
page for the TI-74. I haven't got a chance to contact any of them for
information.
Check out: http://www.ti.com/calc/docs/7495.htm
Jeff Salzman
----------------------------
Zu denken ist gut, da=DF Sie sind gut
>
>Does anyone know any technical dokumentation for the
>TI PC-234 printer and/or the TI-74 interface ? I couldn't
>find any usefull trace in the web.
>
One more question:
Does anyone know any technical dokumentation for the
TI PC-234 printer and/or the TI-74 interface ? I couldn't
find any usefull trace in the web.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> Since we are off topic, read the Bill of Rights and the Constitution
> sometime if you want an idea of just how many of your rights (re:
> freedom) have been usurped in your 'best interest' by our omnipresent
> Federal Government. This spy satellite pales in comparison to the
> invasion of personal liberty that has been either legislated by
> Congress or in the case of our Constitutional Rights bent in
> interpretation by the Supreme Court under the guise of a 'living
> breathing Constitution.' Bullshit. The Constitution doesn't need
> interpretation, it is written very clearly and has been raped.
I may be naive, but I understand that the satellite was owned by
a connecticut company who was have it launched to replace the one
which went bad earlier this year, knocking out millions of pagers,
etc.
> several years. Its the payload of the first that exploded that's very
> curious to me: a high-tech spy satellite capable of listening on on
> thousands of phone calls and other communications, costing how many
> billions? You'd think they would be REALLY, REALLY careful with a toy
> like that.
So would I... and I would have suspect that such a satellite would have
been launched from vandenburg. This is part of the reason I do believe
it was a communicates satellite.
BTW - if not from vandenburg, then aboard a shuttle...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
"Max Eskin" <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>Give me a break! Rockets explode all of the time. Plus, I would guess
>some of the parts they are using are old. I have the feeling cracked
>seals could once again be the problem. Also, rockets don't rely on
>computer controls. These are 20-year old technology. It's unlikely
>they have anything more than a bunch of servos like in a model car.
Actually, from the news report I heard, it was a new launch vehicle.
The maiden flight... That doesn't contradict the idea it may be old
technology, but supposedly the vehicle was one of a new series...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Someone here mentioned a few days ago that he had the drivers
for a hitachi cd-rom drive. Does anyone remember who it was? I want to
test this thing before shipping it.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>at $ prompt type in drive name
>
> $ DK0
What sort of media are you actually trying to boot? Why do you think
it's got a valid boot-block?
>It now takes me back to the @ prompt.
>Type in 0g
>
> @0g
>
>and I get 000002 back.
>I'm assuming that the '2' I get back is an error of some sort. Can anyone
>shed any light
>on this one for me.
Nope, it's not an error - it's the address the CPU stopped at. It's
certainly the case that at address 0, there's a "HALT" instruction
(i.e. the contents are zero.) This is very possibly because the boot
block you read into location 0 was all zeroes - i.e. not a boot block
at all.
-----
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology Voice: 301-767-5917
7328 Bradley Blvd Fax: 301-767-5927
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817
I got one with an expansion box, monitor, and 2 disk drives for $2.50. I
also got a LOAD of software with it. It was working fine 'till the monitor
blew. I tried fixing it, and got it working, but it was a bit wavy. Then
the P/S for the expansion unit blew, so I sold the whole deal for $20.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Jim <jim(a)calico.litterbox.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: trs80model1
> Date: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 8:06 PM
>
> Ooo, TRS-80 model 1. The first computer that ever inspired lust in my
heart
> - I don't suppose these can be had inexpensively...
> --
> Jim Strickland
> jim(a)calico.litterbox.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooo, TRS-80 model 1. The first computer that ever inspired lust in my heart
- I don't suppose these can be had inexpensively...
--
Jim Strickland
jim(a)calico.litterbox.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I used to have a Model 1. I believe the logical answer for why Drive 0 was
at the beginning of the cable was do that it was the closest to the
computer, ant it would make it less confusing for novice computer users:
Closest drive gets the boot disk.
As for the drive with a resistor pack needing to be at the end of the
cable, I disagree. I had a two-disk system, and both drives were
identical. I know that, because when I first got the computer, I plugged
the drives in, turned them on, turned on the expansion box, and turned on
the computer, and they worked. I tried the drives the other way (switched
them on the cable), and they still worked.
I'm also sure that neither had the resistor pack, because when I got the
computer, it was supposed to have 4 drives. There was, however, another
Model 1 with an expansion box, but no drives. The person who was selling
the computers took drives 3 and 4 off of the one that I got, and put them
on the other one. My friend bought it, and the drives worked on it, too.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: TRS-80 Hard drives (was:Cable needed)
> Date: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 1:42 PM
>
> It would have been a lot simpler if the connectors had been fitted in the
> opposite order so that drive 0 was at the end of the cable. Then the
> terminated drive always would have gone at the end of the cable, and
> would always have been Drive 0. No idea why they didn't do this.
>
> -tony
>
I don't think so. These are add-on modules specifically
for the PC-jr. I posted this because I'm pretty sure
there are at least a couple of PC-jr fans out there.
Jeff
At 11:51 AM 9/1/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Is PCjr stuff compatible with the IBM PC Convertible?
>
> Megan Gentry
> Former RT-11 Developer
>
>+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
>| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
>| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
>| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
>| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
>| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
>+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>
In a message dated 98-09-01 11:54:05 EDT, you write:
<< Is PCjr stuff compatible with the IBM PC Convertible?
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer >>
no. totally incompatible.
At 04:26 PM 8/31/98 -0700, Sam Ismail wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Aug 1998, John Foust wrote:
>
>> WinNT is quite stable. I've been running it for years - since 3.0,
>> I think, under heavy daily software development.
>
>Use Linux instead. Its far less picky about its hardware (and a whole
>lot more stable too, not to mention just a better OS).
Yeah, then there's that really big market of Linux users who love to
pay for software.
I use Linux alot, but not for running Microsoft products or Windows code.
All my firewalls and source code servers are Linux. The SGI version
of my product easily recompiles and runs under Linux and X Window.
We used it occasionally to use Checker and Electric Fence for debugging.
I've got hundreds of unsold CDs of a Linux-based 3D product in the
basement, left over from when my company was acquired. I'll gladly
send a CD of it for free to anyone in the world who wants to send me
a piece of old computer junk or software in trade. See my web page
to see what I like.
(See a description of Megahedron
at http://www.threedee.com/mhedron/mhedron.htm>,
and download a free, fully functional demo for Win95/NT x86 and AXP,
Linux and SGI IRIX from <http://www.threedee.com/demos/demos.html>.)
Frankly, Linux doesn't fit under the ten-year-rule. We'll need to
wait until 2003 for that. Sure, it might run on old PCs, though.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
The post about the Shugart HD's reminded me of something. I'm also looking
for a hard drive and external disk boxes for a TRS-80 Model III. I'm not
sure if the HD's needed to be special for the III (never had a HD for it),
but I had model 1 disk drives on it, and they were working. So any model
disk box should be O.K.
ThAnX in advance,
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
Guys:
I just snarfed some PC-jr modules:
2 - 128k Ram expansion
1 - Parallel printer module
1 - Speech Module
I cut open the speech and printer modules, and they seem to be
in pretty good shape, although I don't know if any of this
stuff actually works.
If this is of any value to anyone, I'll offer it for trade for
something interesting (I collect mostly Motorola related stuff),
or some reasonable $$.
PLease reply via private e-mail.
Thanx,
Jeff